Users Online: 893 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 

 

 
Table of Contents
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 37  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 179-195

COVID-19 ARDS: A Multispecialty Assessment of Challenges in Care, Review of Research, and Recommendations


1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Level III IFH MONUSCO, Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Level III IFH MONUSCO, Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo
3 Department of Radio-diagnosis and Imaging, Level III IFH MONUSCO, Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo
4 Department of Psychiatry, Level III IFH MONUSCO, Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo
5 Department of Pathology, Level III IFH MONUSCO, Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo
6 Consultant Radiology, Alchemist Ojas Hospital, Panchkula, Haryana, India
7 Department of Paediatrics, 166 Military Hospital, Jammu, India

Date of Submission07-Jan-2021
Date of Decision12-Apr-2021
Date of Acceptance17-Apr-2021
Date of Web Publication15-Jul-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Shibu Sasidharan
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Level III Hospital, Goma
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_14_21

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Physicians and care providers are familiar with the management of ARDS, however, when it occurs as a sequalae of COVID-19, it has different features and there remains uncertainty on the consensus of management. To answer this question on how it compares and contrasts with ARDS from other causes, the authors reviewed the published literature and management guidelines as well as their own clinical experience while managing patients with COVID-19 ARDS. For research, a PubMed search was conducted on 01.04.2021 using the systematic review filter to identify articles that were published using MeSH terms COVID-19 and ARDS. Systematic reviews or meta-analyses were selected from a systematic search for literature containing diagnostic, prognostic and management strategies in MEDLINE/PubMed. Those were compared and reviewed to the existing practices by the various treating specialists and recommendations were made. Specifically, the COVID-19 ARDS, its risk factors and pathophysiology, lab diagnosis, radiological findings, rational of recommendation of drugs proposed so far, oxygenation and ventilation strategies and the psychological ramifications of the disease were. discussed. Because of the high mortality in mechanically ventilated patients, the above recommendations and findings direct the potential for improvement in the management of patients with COVID-19 ARDS.

Keywords: ARDS, COVID19, ICU


How to cite this article:
Sasidharan S, Singh V, Singh J, Madan GS, Dhillon HS, Dash PK, Shibu B, Dhillon GK. COVID-19 ARDS: A Multispecialty Assessment of Challenges in Care, Review of Research, and Recommendations. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2021;37:179-95

How to cite this URL:
Sasidharan S, Singh V, Singh J, Madan GS, Dhillon HS, Dash PK, Shibu B, Dhillon GK. COVID-19 ARDS: A Multispecialty Assessment of Challenges in Care, Review of Research, and Recommendations. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 27];37:179-95. Available from: https://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2021/37/2/179/321395


  Introduction Top


The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute infectious disease caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The World Health Organization (WHO) has labelled COVID-19 as a global infectious disease pandemic. COVID-19 is the third major outbreak caused by coronavirus in this century, with the earlier ones being severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). Physicians and care providers are familiar with the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), however, when it occurs as a sequela of COVID-19, it has different features and there remains uncertainty on the consensus of management. To answer this question on how it compares and contrasts with ARDS from other causes, we undertook a review of the published literature (Pubmed Search on 01-04-2021, using MeSH terms "covid-19", "pneumonia", "ARDS", "pathogenesis", "epidemiology", "survival", "therapeutics", and "complications") and also based on our own clinical experience of managing patients with COVID-19 ARDS in DR Congo and India. This information will provide an insight to the pattern of patient response and challenges faced by the ICU teams and give a comprehensive multispeciality recommendation for circumnavigating these difficulties.


  History Top


The World Health Organization on 31 December 2019 formally notified about a cluster of cases of pneumonia in Wuhan City, central China. By 05 January 2020, 59 cases were known and none had been fatal.[1] Ten days later, there were 282 confirmed cases, of which four were in Japan, South Korea, and Thailand.[2] By then, there had been six deaths in Wuhan, 51 people were severely ill, and 12 were critical. The responsible pathogen was isolated on 7 January and its genome was shared on 12 January.[3] The causative organism of the SARS, now named as COVID-19, was a novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2. Today, history is continuously being rewritten, and as of 08 July 2020, there are 12M confirmed cases and 548K deaths worldwide. 168,957 new cases of COVID-19 worldwide were being confirmed daily and the death rate was over 4,147 per day.[4] These numbers are conceivably an underestimate of the actual infected and dead because of restrictions of surveillance and testing.


  Clinical Features and Classification Top


The patients are classified vide, WHO, and CCDC guidelines into mild, moderate, severe and critical illness on the basis of their symptoms.[5]

The details can be removed as the focus of the article is ARDS. The symptomatolgy is already discussed in many articles.


  Definition of ARDS Top


The affected patients are classified vide, WHO, and CCDC guidelines with mild, moderate, severe and critical illness on the basis of their symptoms.[5],[6] COVID-19 ARDS (CARDS) is diagnosed when someone with a confirmed COVID-19 infection meets the Berlin 2012 ARDS diagnostic criteria,[7] which include:

  1. acute hypoxemic respiratory failure;
  2. presentation within 1 week of worsening respiratory symptoms;
  3. bilateral airspace disease on chest X-ray, computed tomography (CT), or ultrasound that is not fully explained by effusions, lobar or lung collapse, or nodules; and
  4. cardiac failure is not the primary cause of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure



  Phenotypes of CARDS Top


CARDS is of two phenotypes and also varies in terms of management:

  1. Type L - characterized by low elastance, high compliance, low lung weight, low lung recruitability, and low ventilation-to perfusion (V/Q) ratio.[8] This phenotype displays normal breathing but has low oxygen saturations ("silent hypoxemia" or "happy hypoxic")
  2. Type H - characterized by high elastance, low compliance, high lung weight, high lung recruitability, and high right-to-left shunt. This type of pneumonia has features similar to typical ARDS.



  Possible Pathogenesis and Treatment Strategy Top


Clinical studies on pathogenesis of COVID-19 shows association with coagulopathy. This however differs from sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) by the relatively normal levels of PT, fibrinogen, and platelets, despite markedly elevated d-dimer levels. Although the primary pathogenesis was thought as pulmonary type II pneumocyte injury, viral pneumonia, ARDS or macrophage activating like syndrome complicating ARDS leading to DIC; the pathological evidence from autopsy series show that the major pathogenic mechanism is "Pulmonary Intravascular Coagulopathy (PIC)" as firstly named by McGonagle et al. This is a kind of immune thrombosis that is distinct from classical DIC.

SARS-CoV2 binds to Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors on type II pneumocytes and possibly on vascular endothelial cells and causes lysis of the cells immediately leading to direct activation of the endothelium causing procoagulant activity and activates accumulation of fibrin deposits in pulmonary microcapillary venous vessels. The fibrin deposits cause a compensatory mechanism of increased plasminogen at the beginning but as the disease progresses fail to break down the fibrin deposits reflected in increased d-dimer levels.

In the lung, SARS-CoV-2 causes acute diffuse alveolar damage, pneumocyte hyperplasia, and interstitial pneumonia.

In the acute stage of ARDS, there is diffuse alveolar damage in the lung along with formation of hyaline membrane in the alveoli which is followed sequentially by interstitial widening edema and later proliferation of fibroblasts in the organizing stage.[9] COVID-19 ARDS causes the typical ARDS pathological changes of diffuse alveolar damage in the lung.[10] During the illness, lung fibrosis appears in the long term.

Coagulation dysfunction is common in COVID-19 (detected by raised D-dimer levels). Fatal cases have shown diffuse microvascular thrombosis, suggesting a thrombotic microangiopathy, and evidence of thrombotic DIC.[11] This explains the atypical manifestations seen in the lung, like dilated pulmonary vessels on the CT Chest, and episodes of pleuritic pain. Vascular enlargement is not seen in typical ARDS, but seen in most cases of COVID-19 ARDS.[12]

Microscopy: Microscopic picture shows exudative and proliferative phases of diffuse alveolar damage. Electron microscopy reveals that viral particles were predominantly located in the pneumocytes. The predominant pattern of lung lesions in patients with COVID-19 is diffuse alveolar damage, as described in patients infected with SARS and MERS coronaviruses. Hyaline membrane formation and pneumocyte atypical hyperplasia are frequent. The presence of platelet–fibrin thrombi in small arterial vessels is consistent with coagulopathy, which appears to be common in patients with COVID-19 and should be one of the main targets of therapy.[13]

Biomarkers: Recent studies have suggested that in addition to direct viral damage, uncontrolled inflammation contributes to disease severity in COVID-19. Consistent with this hypothesis, high levels of inflammatory markers, including C-Reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, D-dimer, high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, increased levels of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines have been observed in patients with severe disease. Pathogenic inflammation, also referred to as cytokine storm, shares similarities with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV10. Inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and IL-1β could help predict the course and outcome of disease in COVID-19. A high IL-6 predicted a 227% increase in chances of death, and TNF-α reduced the chances of survival by 150%. It has been found that when IL-6 and TNF-α are high at the time of admission, the patient is likely to have severe disease and reduced survival, irrespective of the use of other clinical and laboratory findings.[14]

Procalcitonin (PCT) has emerged as a crucial biomarker for the severity and prognosis of COVID19 infection. Italian researchers have reported that the risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection was nearly five times higher in COVID-19 patients with raised PCT levels. A retrospective, multi-center study of 191 confirmed COVID-19 cases in Wuhan, China, reported that three indicators—higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, a D-dimer ≥1 μg/L, and advanced age---produced significantly higher mortality risk. These markers could help identify patients in the early stages of COVID-19 with a poor prognosis.

Laboratory: The protocol for doing a RT-PCR is as per [Table 1]. Peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR ratio [(d-NLR), neutrophil count divided by the result of WBC count minus neutrophil count], platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) are indicators of the systematic inflammatory response that are widely investigated as useful predictors for the prognosis of viral pneumonia. WBC count, NLR, LMR, PLR, CRP, and d-NLR of severe patients were significantly higher than those of non-severe patients. The optimal threshold at 3.3 for NLR showed a superior prognostic possibility of clinical symptoms to change from mild to severe, which had the highest of sensitivity and specificity. When age ≥49.5 years and NLR ≥3.3, 46.1% of the COVID-19 patients with mild disease became severe in a mean time of 6.3 days. Therefore, these patients must be closely attended to by clinicians. By contrast, when age <49.5 years and NLR <3.3, COVID-19 patients with mild disease were cured and discharged in approximately 13.5 days.[15]
Table 1: Protocol for laboratory testing

Click here to view


The Systemic Inflammation Index (SII = neutrophil × platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio), the aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI = neutrophil × platelet × monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI = neutrophil × monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio), are all used as markers to predict mortality in COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital. However, SII emerged as the sole reliable COVID-19 prognostic hematological parameter in the retrospective evaluation of COVID-19 patients.


  Determinants of Adverse Outcomes Top


COVID-19 ARDS appears to have significantly worse outcomes compared to ARDS from other causes, as per [Table 2].
Table 2: Mortality and Outcomes

Click here to view


Risk factors for poor outcomes include advanced age; presence of comorbidities such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus; lower lymphocyte counts; kidney injury; and raised D-dimer levels.[18] Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) often fare worse compared to patients with other conditions.


  Radiodiagnosis and Imaging in COVID19 ARDS Top


Imaging assists in establishing diagnosis; triage; and providing management guiding actionable results.[19] The radiological armamentarium available for COVID includes routine chest radiograph (CXR), CT, and point-of-care thoracic ultrasonography (POCUS).[20]

CXR is sensitive only when patients present late or with advanced symptoms. CXR findings include patchy peripheral consolidation or ground glass opacities (GGO) with predilection for lower and middle lobes. The consolidation is bilateral in 75% of patients and unilateral in 25%.[21] Occasional nodules, perihilar consolidation, and prominence of perihilar vasculature are also noted.[22]

Non-contrast high-resolution continuous helical CT scan of the thorax is the preferred protocol for evaluating COVID-19 patients. However, contrast may be administered in select cases to exclude other complications like pulmonary thromboembolism.[23] GGO with peripheral and lower lobe predilection are the most common findings. In addition, crazy paving (GGO with thickened interlobular and intralobular septa), vascular distension in region of GGO may be seen early in the disease.[19],[23] Later, the imaging appearance progresses to architectural distortion, subpleural bands, fibrosis, and traction bronchiectasis [Figure 1]. Consolidation may superimpose on the GGO later in the disease and in older and high-risk individuals. Pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, lymphadenopathy, and pneumothorax are also uncommonly seen.[19],[23]
Figure 1: Imaging comparison of three patients of COVID-19

Click here to view


COVID-19 can initially present as a subpleural disease. Therefore, the accuracy of POCUS as screening tool is limited. It has significant value, however, in monitoring the progress of critically COVID patients in ICU. The findings are described with images in [Table 3].
Table 3: POCUS and its interpretation

Click here to view


The recommendations of Fleischner Society on the role of chest imaging in COVID patients are mentioned in [Figure 2][19]:
Figure 2: Recommendations on chest imaging

Click here to view


In March 2020, the Dutch Radiological Society developed another score system based on chest CT and patient's data; the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) included data of clinical finding and laboratory test results in addition to CT records. The degree of suspicion ranged from very low to very high (CO-RADS categories 1–5), while category 0 reflects negative infection and category 6 establishes RT-PCR-positive SARS-Cov-2 infection at time of examination [Table 5]. CT score in addition to patient's clinical parameters empowers the triage options especially during the peak of the pandemic wave.
Table 4: Summary of drugs evaluated for COVID-19

Click here to view
Table 5: Overview of CO-RADS categories and the corresponding level of suspicion for pulmonary involvement in COVID-19

Click here to view



  Echocardiographic Evaluation in Cards Top


Recent reports suggest that cardiac complications not only are common (≈20–25%) in COVID-19 infection but also are associated with increased mortality. The most frequent abnormality was found to be right ventricular dilation or dysfunction. However, in those reports, cardiac complications were defined according to clinical and laboratory parameters (troponin levels), without any systematic cardiac imaging. Transthoracic echocardiography is indicated only when there is clinical deterioration.

Alongside the subclinical ventricular relaxation impairment (given the advanced age and comorbidities like systemic hypertension), the conglomeration of factors specific to COVID-19 such as systemic inflammatory milieu, endothelial dysfunction, microvascular thrombosis, arrhythmias, disturbed ventricular cross-talk (owing to the concomitant right ventricular dysfunction resulting from pulmonary hypertension), and myocardial oxygen supply--demand perturbations, can contribute significantly to the LVDD with a subsequent accentuated potential to culminate as heart failure with preserved ejection--fraction (HFpEF).

At the same time, the use of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), quite commonly employed while ventilating hypoxemic COVID-19 patients can also result in an attenuated cardiac output in the face of an already impaired ventricular filling in HFpEF.

Among patients developing clinical deterioration during follow-up (20% of hospitalized patients), repeat echocardiogram shows further deterioration of the right ventricular parameters, probably related to increased pulmonary resistance.

The underlying cardiopulmonary interactions present unique challenges in weaning the mechanically ventilated patients with co-existent LVDD.


  Medical Management of SARS CoV-2 Infection Top


In view of the lack of availability of approved specific drug therapy for SARS Cov-2 treatment is essentially supportive and symptomatic. The initial step involves triage of patients of SARS CoV-2 into mild, moderate, severe, and critical categories depending upon the severity of clinical presentation vide WHO and CCDC guidelines.[24]

Patients with worsening hypoxia require management in hospital with supplemental oxygen by either high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or non-invasive ventilation. Intubation and mechanical ventilation are indicated in patients having severe illness. They may also require concomitant intensive care management of multiorgan dysfunction by a multidisciplinary team of treating specialists. The treatment of severe COVID-19 illness includes aggressive treatment of complications, prophylaxis for secondary infection, thrombotic events, and organ function support based on treatment of underlying disease.[25] ICU practices that prevent ARDS or aid in early recognition and effective treatment of the events leading to ARDS, like lung-protective ventilation and conservative fluid management, remain essential elements to achieve desired improved outcomes.

As there is no approved specific pharmacotherapy for COVID-19, various drugs have been tried by treating doctors across the world with variable results. Currently, research trials are underway to find a definite cure, but there is no consensus on a specific drug being effective in curing SARS CoV-2 infection. Experimental and repurposed therapies that stand unsupported by strong evidence are to be strongly discouraged.


  Treatments Evaluated for COVID-19 Top


  1. Hydroxychloroquine: Based on experience with earlier viral illnesses, HCQ was proposed to be likely effective therapy for COVID-19 besides prophylaxis. In an observational study by Joshua et al.[26] involving 1,376 patients with COVID-19 admitted to the hospital, HCQ administration was not associated with either a greatly lowered or an increased risk of the composite end point of intubation or death.[26] It has now been stopped because of lack of efficacy. WHO guidelines recommend against prescribing HCQ for prophylaxis (both post and pre-exposure) in individuals with confirmed or suspected exposure to SARS-CoV-2.
  2. Hydroxychloroquine plus Azithromycin: Combination therapy was initially attempted to treat COVID-19, however, subsequently discontinued because of cardiac arrhythmias secondary to increased QT interval resulting in fatality in a few.
  3. Lopinavir-Ritonavir: These anti-retroviral drugs, initially considered promising in SARS-CoV-2 infection failed in expected outcomes. WHO accepted the recommendation from Solidarity Trial's International Steering Committee vide press release dated 04 July 2020 to discontinue lopinavir-ritonavir arm of the trial because of evidence of little or no reduction in mortality of hospitalized COVID-19 patients when compared to standard of care.
  4. Favipiravir: This selective RNA polymerase inhibitor, under study in various trials around the world, inhibits viral replication. Two clinical trials (Japan, USA) and a phase-3 clinical trial in India using favipiravir combined with another antiviral agent, Umifenovir are ongoing.[27] Results are awaited.
  5. Remdesivir: A nucleotide analogue prodrug that is intracellularly metabolized to an analogue of adenosine triphosphate that inhibits viral RNA polymerases has shown in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2. The first published report with a group of patients receiving remdesivir in a compassionate-use programme, described clinical improvement in 36 of 53 hospitalized patients (68%) with severe COVID-19.[27] US FDA issued an EUA of remdesivir to allow its emergency use for severe COVID-19 (confirmed or suspected) in hospitalized patients.[28],[29] Currently, several phase-3 clinical trials are evaluating it for treatment of moderate and severe COVID-19.
  6. Dexamethasone: Practise of using dexamethasone varied widely across the world with many treatment guidelines having conflicting reports on use of corticosteroids in COVID-19 illness[30] but in China they were being used in severe cases.[31] However, the RECOVERY trial (with over 11,500 patients enrolled from over 175 NHS hospitals in the UK) provided clear evidence that dexamethasone 6 mg per day for up to 10 days reduces 28-day mortality in COVID-19 patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation by one-third, and by one-fifth in patients receiving oxygen without invasive mechanical ventilation. No benefit was demonstrated in hospitalized COVID-19 patients who were not receiving respiratory support and results were consistent with possible harm in this group.[32]
  7. Convalescent Plasma: Convalescent plasma, collected from donors having recovered from recent COVID-19 infection, contains anti-SARS-CoV-2 virus antibodies that can be used to treat other COVID-19 patients. Data from a study in USA involving 20,000 patients transfused with COVID-19 convalescent plasma demonstrate that its use is safe and carries no excess risk of complications and supports the premise that administration of the same early during illness is likely to reduce mortality.[33] Another study by Liu et al. showed that convalescent plasma transfusion improved survival in non-intubated patients but not in intubated patients.[34] The FDA states that it is important to determine its safety and efficacy via clinical trials before routinely administering convalescent plasma to patients with COVID-19.
  8. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitors: Interleukin-6 is a pleiotropic pro-inflammatory cytokine produced by various cell types including lymphocytes, monocytes, and fibroblasts. SARS CoV-2 virus induces IL-6 production from bronchial epithelial cells causing inflammation. Various IL-6 inhibitors (like sarilumab, tocilizumab) are under evaluation for their efficacy in management of COVID-19. However, presently there is inconclusive data to recommend for or against the use of IL-6 inhibitors.[35]
  9. Nitric Oxide: Potential role of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in preventing progression of disease in those with severe ARDS is under evaluation.[36] Routine use of iNO in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia is not recommended and the trial is recommended only in mechanically ventilated patients with severe ARDS and hypoxemia despite other rescue strategies.[37] Studies are ongoing to evaluate for the efficacy and safety of iNO in SARS-CoV-2 patients requiring supplemental oxygen before the disease progresses to necessitating mechanical ventilatory support.
  10. Anticoagulants: To break fibrin deposits in pulmonary microvasculature, the treatment strategy is focussed at blockage of hypercoagulation with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for blocking thrombin and dampen the inflammatory response. LMWH at prophylactic doses should be administered to all symptomatic patients with microbiologically or radiologically documented COVID-19 diagnosis and escalated to therapeutic doses in case of respiratory distress. In case LMWH is insufficient of preventing further activation of PIC and the thromboses extend to pulmonary veins, the process will proceed to secondary pulmonary hypertension and cardiac insufficiency. Increased intravascular pressure in lungs will result in extensive alveolar exudation, resulting causing marked hypoxia. As a consequence of decreased pulmonary venous flow, the left ventricular stroke volume will decrease leading to systemic hypotension. The treatment option at this step should be Tissue Plasminogen Activator (TPA) or defibrotide. These two fibrinolytic modalities can prevent intubation and progression to DIC.
  11. COVID-19 Vaccine: As of 18 February 2021, at least seven different vaccines across three platforms have been rolled out in countries. Vulnerable populations in all countries are the highest priority for vaccination. The vaccines must be proven safe and effective in large (phase III) clinical trials. Some COVID-19 vaccine candidates have completed their phase III trials, and many other potential vaccines are being developed. An external panel of experts convened by WHO, called the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE), analyses the results from clinical trials, along with evidence on the disease, age groups affected, risk factors for disease, programmatic use, and other information. SAGE then recommends whether and how the vaccines should be used.


The vaccines available for use in the USA, and India are displayed in [Table 6] and [Table 7].
Table 6: Vaccines used in the United States

Click here to view
Table 7: Vaccines used in India (till April, 2021)

Click here to view


In India, on April 12, 2021, Russian Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccine was approved for use.

Status of COVID-19 Vaccines within WHO EUL/PQ evaluation process as on June 03rd is attached as Appendix 1.[38]

While a COVID-19 vaccine will protect you from serious illness and death, we still don't know the extent to which it keeps you from being infected and passing the virus on to others. To help keep others safe, COVID appropriate behaviour is necessary. Always follow guidance from local authorities based on the situation and risk where you live.


  Oxygenation and Ventilation for COVID-19 ARDS Patients Top


COVID-19 ARDS follows an anticipated time course, with a median time to intubation of 8--10 days after symptom onset.[39] It is therefore imperative to constantly monitor patients for the development of ARDS as the days of infection progresses. The primary strategy for COVID-19 patients is supportive care, which includes oxygen therapy for hypoxemic patients. Oxygen therapy is instituted if respiratory rate is of 30 breaths/min. or above and/or SpO2 of 93% on breathing air.

NON-INVASIVE MODES

High-flow oxygen therapy (HFNO) should be started if there is a respiratory failure and mild--moderate ARDS. HFNO is used as first-line treatment, followed by noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in CARDS.[39] However, NIV is not recommended for patients with failed HFNO. NIV provides benefit via PEEP, to patients with mild--moderate ARDS by reducing the respiratory load and intubation rate but it can cause significant aerosol generation.

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for HFNO is effective in improving oxygenation, but due to reports of high amount of aerosol dispersion it was not recommended initially. However, further studies in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, HFNC was proven to avoid intubation compared to conventional oxygen devices, and the scientific evidence of generation and dispersion of bio-aerosols via HFNC showed a similar risk to standard oxygen masks. HFNC prong with a surgical mask on the patient's face is thus a reasonable modality to benefit hypoxemic COVID-19 patients and avoid intubation.[40]

INTUBATION AND INVASIVE MECHANICAL VENTILATION OF COVID-19 ARDS PATIENTS

Mechanical ventilation of COVID-19 patients with ARDS is really a challenging task as these patients usually have non-homogenous lung pathology. This requires a targeted lung-protective ventilation strategy to improve the outcome.

The indications for mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 ARDS[41],[42] are as follows:

  1. Acute hypoxic respiratory failure with severe respiratory distress.
  2. Worsening hypoxia associated with increased labored breathing.
  3. Increased work of breathing associated with use of accessory muscles of respiration.
  4. Failure to maintain SpO2 >90% with >50 L/min of HFNO or with maximal supplemental oxygen.
  5. Hypoxia with altered mental status and failure to maintain airway patency.
  6. Patient with multiorgan failure, persistent hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressor support, or those with multiple comorbidities like (DM, Cardiovascular disease, hypertension, advanced age, frailty, cancer, or chronic respiratory disease).
  7. Arterial pH <7.3 with PaCO2 >50 mm Hg.
  8. PaO2/FiO2 <200.[43]
  9. High respiratory rate with persistent thoraco-abdominal asynchrony or paradoxical respiration.
  10. Low ROX index[44] (<4.88) with patient on HFNC.


The indications for intubation and mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients are not limited to the above-mentioned conditions and and is at the at the discretion of the treating physician.[45]

Precautions and Procedures while intubating COVID-19 patients

Airway management and intubation in COVID-19 patients is an aerosol-generating procedure and is associated with increased risk of viral transmission to the healthcare providers. Hence, a high level of attentiveness and alertness is necessary to prevent infection when intubation is performed. The following points are to be ensured for safety of patients and healthcare providers[46]-

  1. Standard level 3 protection should be donned while performing intubation.
  2. Standard monitoring, IV access, instruments, drugs, ventilator, and suction should be pre-checked.
  3. Tracheal intubation should be performed by the most experienced anesthesiologist in an airborne infection isolation room to ensure patient safety as well as of healthcare worker (HCW)
  4. Limit the number of healthcare providers in the room/cubicle prior to intubation.
  5. Use 3--5 min. pre-oxygenation with 100% oxygen as these critical patients have poor oxygen reserve.
  6. Spontaneous ventilation should be preserved and assisted bag mask ventilation during preoxygenation should be avoided.
  7. RSI (rapid sequence intubation) technique should be used to avoid manual ventilation of the patient's lungs and the potential aerosolization of the virus from the airways.[47]
  8. Use both hands to hold the mask to ensure a tight seal using the V-E technique rather than the C-E technique with one hand.
  9. Video laryngoscope is preferred for intubation.
  10. Airway management should be safe, accurate, and should be accomplished within 15--20 s.
  11. After tracheal intubation, clamp the endotracheal tube (ETT) and inflate the cuff before instituting ventilation. A COVID aerosol barrier has been used extensively for intubation.[48]
  12. Viral and HME filter to be applied between endotracheal tube and circuit.
  13. Proper tube placement can be identified by EtCO2 monitoring and visible bilateral chest rise. Avoid auscultation to confirm tube placement.
  14. Supraglottic airway devices (SGAD) to be used in CICO (Can't intubate and can't oxygenate) situations only and bedside tracheostomy to be performed as early as possible.


Ventilatory strategy for COVID-19 ARDS

The most appropriate time to intubate COVID-19 patients is still not clear. However, early and timely institution of mechanical ventilation can be considered if the COVID-19 patient develops moderate to severe ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 <200) to prevent Patient self-induced lung injury (P- SILI).[43] Non-intubated spontaneously breathing ARDS patients are at increased risk of P-SILI because of high intake of inhaled tidal volume. Therefore, esophageal pressure measurement by manometer can be considered in spontaneously breathing, non-intubated patients to decide the time for intubation.[49] The esophageal pressure between 05 and 10 cm H2O is usually well tolerated. However, if pressure progresses beyond 15 cm H2O, then the risk of P-SILI increases and intubation shouldn't be delayed. If esophageal manometry is not available, then change in CVP (central venous pressure) with respiration or clinical assessment of excessive inspiratory effort for increased work of breathing can be considered [Figure 3].[50]
Figure 3: Ventilatory settings

Click here to view


Mortality is very high for COVID-19 ARDS patients on mechanical ventilation. Inappropriate ventilatory strategy in ARDS patients can lead to Ventilator induced lung injury (VILI), which includes barotrauma (high airway pressure), volutrauma, atelectrauma, biotrauma, myotrauma (diaphragmatic injury), and oxytrauma (oxygen free radicals).

Strategies to promote lung protection in ARDS: -

a.Lung protective ventilation[51]-

This approach of ventilation in patients with ARDS is based upon several randomized trials and meta-analyses that have reported survival benefit from lung-protective ventilation. Initial ventilatory settings for these patients are recommended as below:

b.Role of PEEP in COVID-19 ARDS

There is an ambiguity with respect to the usage of adequate PEEP for COVID-19 ARDS patients. Using higher PEEP (any PEEP >10 cm H2O) was not recommended based on the heterogenicity of lung involvement in COVID-19 patients with simultaneous existence of severely affected areas with non-affected areas in the lung.[52] However, surviving sepsis campaign guidelines on management of critically ill adults from COVID-19, European Intensive and Critical Care Guidelines, recommend PEEP >10 cm H2O for management of ARDS because of SARS-CoV-2.

c.Compliance

In COVID-19 patients, lung compliance needs to be constantly assessed. If compliance is high or normal with the existence of hypoxemia, it is recommended to use a PEEP of less than 10 cm H2O to avoid over-distention of normal healthy alveoli. However, if compliance is low as seen in ARDS, then it's advised to use adequate PEEP of just above the lower inflection point on the pressure volume loop on the ventilator to recruit collapsed alveoli, to prevent atelectasis, and thereby improve oxygenation.

Once the initial setting on the ventilator is entered, monitoring of the following parameters is done to ascertain patient progress:

  1. Plateau pressure – PPlat should be below 30 cm H2O.
  2. Driving pressure is kept below 15 cm H2O. This can be achieved by either decreasing tidal volume (at the risk of development of hypercapnia) or by increasing PEEP, which can cause over-distention of alveoli. Therefore, careful titrations are required.
  3. Compliance – Normally the total compliance of both lungs in an adult is about 200 ml/cm H2O. Low compliance is usually found in ARDS patients with stiff lung. There are two types of lung compliance:


  1. Static compliance = Tidal volume/(Pplat- PEEP)


  2. Static compliance measures pulmonary compliance when no airflow such as during inspiratory pause and it is slightly higher than dynamic compliance.

  3. Dynamic compliance = Tidal volume/(PIP – PEEP)


  4. It represents pulmonary compliance during active inspiration and depends upon peak inspiratory pressure (PIP). PIP depends on airway resistance. COVID-19 pneumonia usually has high compliance (>40 ml/cm H2O). Therefore, management should be instituted with low PEEP and high tidal volume up to 8--9 ml/kg, if hypercapnia presents.

    However, COVID-19 ARDS is to be managed like ARDS with lung-protective ventilation by keeping low tidal volume (4--6 ml/kg) and high PEEP.

  5. Airway occlusion pressure (PO.1) – The normal value of PO.1 in a spontaneously breathing patient is about 1 cm H2O. However, in mechanically ventilated patients, values above 3.5 cm H2O are associated with increased effort. Keep airway occlusion pressure value in COVID-19 ARDS patients less than 3.5 cm H2O to obtain a ventilatory strategy protective for the lung to prevent it from VILI and diaphragmatic injury (Myotrauma).


d) 1Target goals of mechanical ventilation

  • Target SpO2 = 90-94%
  • PaO2 >55 mm Hg.
  • pH >7.2
  • Fio2 <0.4
  • PaO2/FiO2 >300 mm Hg.


Subsequent ventilatory setting can be decided by periodic checking of Pplat pressure, driving pressure, compliance, and ABG (pH, Oxygenation level). If Pplat pressure >30 cm H2O, then tidal volume can be decreased to 5 ml/kg or if required, further decreases then tidal volume set to 4 ml/kg of predicted body weight.

(e) Adjunctive therapy: The use of adjunctive treatment is relatively less during initial presentation in patients with ARDS, but gradually increase with ARDS severity.

  • Sedation


A combination of multiple agents like (propofol, ketamine, fentanyl, morphine, hydromorphone, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam) may be considered for sedation of COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilator. Usually, COVID-19 patients require high level sedation to ensure patient comfort, alleviate pain, anxiety, avoid ventilator asynchrony, and self-extubation.[53]

  • NMBA (neuromuscular blocker agents)


Can be used in boluses in patients with refractory hypoxemia or ventilator asynchrony to facilitate protective and improved lung ventilation. It also causes reduction of high pulmonary inflation pressures (e.g., ARDS), raised intracranial pressure, and metabolic rate (e.g., work of breathing, shivering).

  • Recruitment maneuvers


WHO interim guidelines recommend the use of intermittent recruitment maneuvres with high PEEP to improve oxygenation in ARDS. However, there are contradicting reports on the use of the same.

  • Steroid administration


WHO recommends steroid administration in COVID-19 ARDS patient on mechanical ventilator if they develop septic shock and require increasing dose of vasopressor to maintain MAP >65 mm Hg in a dose of Inj. Hydrocortisone - 200 mg/day or Prednisolone 75 mg/day.

  • Fluid therapy


Conservative or restricted fluid therapy over liberal fluid is advised, as it may worsen oxygenation in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients.

  • Management of septic shock


WHO interim guidelines[51] recommend the use of crystalloid intravenous balanced fluids like normal saline, Ringer's lactate as fluid bolus (01 litre over 30 min. or faster) for septic shock to check for fluid responsiveness; and avoid using hypotonic fluids, starch-based solution for resuscitation. If no fluid response occurs OR signs of fluid overload appear like crackles on auscultation, then discontinue the fluid and consider using vasopressors. In vasopressors, norepinephrine is the drug of choice, followed by vasopressin and dobutamine to maintain MAP >65 mm Hg and preferably be given through central venous line. These vasopressors to be given as per strictly controlled rate decided as per targeted blood pressure to maintain tissue perfusion. However, peripheral lines can be considered in resource-limited settings keeping a close watch for necrosis of skin or extravasation of vasopressors.

(f)Prone ventilation

If lung-protective ventilation fails to maintain adequate oxygenation and if PaO2/FiO2 <150 mm Hg with PEEP >5 and FiO2 >0.6, then prone ventilation should be considered. Prone ventilation improves oxygenation and decreases V/Q mismatch, particularly when applied early with other lung-protective strategies. In COVID-19 patients, good response to prone positioning may be because of their well-preserved lung compliance compared to patients who develop ARDS from other causes.[48],[54] By optimizing patient selection and treatment protocols, the recently Proning Severe ARDS Patients (PROSEVA) trial demonstrated a significant mortality benefit with prone ventilation.

(g)Role of pulmonary vasodilators

The two most commonly used vasodilators in mechanically ventilated patients are inhaled nitric oxide gas (NO) and Epoprostenol, which are administered by continuous inhalation. They can be considered to improve oxygenation even when PaO2/FiO2 <100 mm Hg despite prone ventilation and if severe hypoxemia is associated with acute pulmonary arterial hypertension.[55] If there is no improvement in the oxygenation after instituting inhaled pulmonary vasodilators, then it should be tapered off without undue delay. The risk of aerosolization and clogging of HME filters is particularly more with epoprostenol, and this remains a concern in COVID-19 patients. That is why inhaled NO is preferred over epoprostenol. In COVID-19 ARDS patients, there is yet no conclusive evidence on the use of pulmonary vasodilators.[55]

(h)Role of ECMO

Even after prone ventilation, if oxygenation doesn't improve and hypoxia still persists, then veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) can be considered. Its use as rescue therapy is considered only in refractory hypoxic respiratory failure.[56] No RCTs or meta-analyses have been conducted for ECMO in COVID-19 patients with ARDS, however, there are reports from China stating its beneficial use. But the process and outcomes have not been mentioned.[57]

(i)Ventilator Weaning and Extubation

Special focus needs to be ensured to avoid viral transmission to the healthcare providers during extubation as it is also an aerosol-generating procedure. Since there is a high chance for reintubation in many patients, some physicians like to use cuff leak test criteria along with spontaneous breathing trials (SBT). This is done to assess the readiness for weaning from mechanical ventilation on the assumption that these patients could have developed airway oedema due to prolonged ventilation. Aerosol generation in cuff leak test is similar to extubation, so caution needs to be taken while performing a cuff leak test. SBT without T-piece at lower pressure support (0--3 cm H2O) and along with prior use of steroid to extubation yielded promising results. The following weaning criteria is recommended before extubation:

  1. Patient should be conscious, comfortable, and oriented.
  2. PaO2/FiO2 >300 mm Hg with PEEP <5 cm H2O.
  3. Hemodynamically stable and maintaining SpO2 with FiO2 <0.4.
  4. RSBI (Rapid shallow breathing index <105) – calculated by respiratory rate/tidal volume in liters when the intubated patient is breathing spontaneously
  5. No signs of increased work of breathing or respiratory distress like use of accessory muscles, paradoxical or asynchronous respiration, nasal flaring, profuse diaphoresis, agitation, tachypnoea, tachycardia and cyanosis.


(j)Prevention of complications

  1. The prevention of complications associated with mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients is important and should be implemented (Table……). The following can be incorporated. In a table.Prevention of VAP[58]
  2. Reduce pressure sores and ulcers by frequent change of position every 2 hours.
  3. Reduce stress ulcer, gastric bleeding by early enteral feeding, and consider PPI or H2 blocker.
  4. Reduce ICU related weakness by early mobilization.
  5. Reduce urinary catheter related infection by using sterile aseptic technique while insertion and consider removal when not needed.
  6. Reduce the number of days on mechanical ventilation by daily assessment for readiness of extubation through spontaneous breathing trials.
  7. Reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism by use of pharmacological agents or mechanical compression devices.



  Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in COVID-19 Top


Long-term outcomes of patients with ARDS are being increasingly recognized as important research targets, as many patients survive ARDS only to have ongoing functional and/or psychological sequelae.

Neuropsychiatric symptoms are atypical presentations of COVID-19. There is a myriad of symptoms ranging from mild headache and myalgia in majority of cases to life threatening seizures and delirium in patients with severe respiratory compromise (ARDS), especially in patients with underlying comorbidities.

Neuropsychiatric symptoms are estimated to appear in around 30% of COVID-19 infected patients.[59] Moderate to severe infection can impair executive functions, confusion, and agitation.[60]

The neurological complications can be divided into primary neuroinvasion[61] by the coronavirus or secondary wave by activated immune and inflammatory mediators. The virus enters the nervous system either directly from the olfactory nerves pathway or is spread via hematogenous route and attaches onto the ACE-2 receptors on the neuronal endothelium.[62] This acute involvement can cause meningitis/encephalitis leading to altered sensorium, delirium, seizures, and/or even coma.[63] It is also hypothesized that direct invasion of medullary neurons could be responsible for severe respiratory failure.[64] Alterations in sensorium and delirium could also be because of hypoxia from respiratory failure, aberrations in coagulation pathways, metabolic imbalances, multiorgan dysfunction, or even iatrogenic (drugs used during mechanical ventilation). Long-term sequelae could be attributed to alterations in immune response and consequent aberrant inflammatory response[65]

Delirium- The prevalence of delirium in intubated patients is up to 80%[66] which expectedly upswings in a COVID-19 patient with ARDS.

The risk factors include old age (>65 years), medical comorbidity, drugs (propofol, opioids, and high-dose benzodiazepines, which are routinely used during mechanical ventilation,[67] and hydroxychloroquine).[68] There are certain COVID-specific environmental risk factors such as mandatory wearing of personal protective equipment (PPE) which accentuates the anxiety and feeling of vulnerability in an alien environment. The patient is deprived of the reassuring and empathetic look on the doctor's face.[69] All these risk factors can impair the patient's perception of the reality and cause disorientation and confusion.

Scales for assessment of Delirium:

The time-tested Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU[70] should be followed routinely. Other useful scales are Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist[71] and the Stanford Proxy Test for Delirium.[72]

Management

  1. Non pharmacologic:


    1. Ensuring a comfortable ambient light in sync with the diurnal cycle.
    2. Ensuring a pain-free spell of 6--8 h of sleep without significant treatment related disruptions.
    3. Regular cognitive stimulation and reorientation of the patient to time, place, and person (utilizing AV aids for virtual communication with family members/other familiar people).
    4. Encouraging physical mobilization at the earliest.
    5. Providing all kinds of possible aids (glasses, hearing aids, mobiles, etc.) to convey a feeling of self-sufficiency and sense of control over the situation.


  2. Pharmacologic


1.Sleep cycle:

Melatonin should be used for regularizing sleep--wake cycle in delirium as it has a short half-life, has additional mild anti-inflammatory properties, and does not cause respiratory depression.[73] Suvorexant (Orexin antagonist) has also been used especially in conjunction with Melatonin.[74] Benzodiazepines should be avoided (except in cases of delirium tremens), as cumulative doses run the risk of respiratory depression and may cause paradoxical disinhibition. Zolpidem (2.5--5 mg) is relatively safer in terms of respiratory functioning, but levels are increased in patients taking ritonavir.

2. Acute agitation/Disruptive behavior

Antipsychotic drugs like haloperidol, olanzapine, or quetiapine are found to be beneficial in the management of the agitation. However, monitoring of QTc interval, neurologic side effects (EPS), and sedation are required. The risk of QTc prolongation gets further amplified, given the potential use of COVID-19-specific medications that themselves prolong QTc (hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin), leading to a potentially increased risk of torsades de pointes.[75]

  1. Haloperidol being a potent dopamine receptor blocker with insignificant anticholinergic and antihistaminic activity (2.5--5 mg) can be used orally or intramuscularly. Intravenous administration should be accompanied by ECG monitoring. Recent research has also shown that haloperidol, due to its effects on sigma receptors, is investigated as a treatment for COVID-19.[76],[77]
  2. Olanzapine 5--10 mg can also be considered either orally or parenterally. In acutely disturbed patients, intramuscular (IM) is the preferred route of administration compared to intravenous (IV) route and gluteal IM injections may be preferred over deltoid injections to increase the distance between respiratory secretion/droplet. IM olanzapine has minimal effect on QTc interval and lesser risk for EPS compared to haloperidol.
  3. Quetiapine (25--50 mg) can be given orally.
  4. Dexmedetomidine is alpha-2 agonist and reduces the release of noradrenaline and helps curtailing restlessness. Clonidine can also be used for the same reason and is more convenient as its available in skin patches form.
  5. Valproic acid is known for its neuroprotective[78] potential and can be used to control extreme emotional fluctuations. It also provides prophylaxis against the potentially epileptogenic state by increasing the seizure threshold. However, liver function tests and platelets need to be constantly monitored.
  6. In extreme cases not responding to the above measures, only short acting low dose oral benzodiazepines (e.g., lorazepam 1--2 mg) may be considered with close monitoring for respiratory distress and respiratory failure.
  7. Mechanical restraint: Mechanical restraint should be used as a last resort for minimum possible time.


3. Mechanical Ventilation

Weaning off mechanical ventilation at times can be associated with acute and severe anxiety that could result in delay in extubation. A very low dose of antipsychotic- Tab Olanzapine 2.5 mg is advisable for anxiolysis.

Drug treatment of patients with pre-existing psychiatric illness

Most psychiatric illnesses are remitting and relapsing in nature and generally require long-term prophylaxis. In the absence of a confirmed treatment for management of COVID-19, a multitude of pharmacotherapeutic agents have been tried in the recent past and can have significant drug interactions with psychotropics and can precipitate a relapse of the illness. Hence, it is imperative to be mindful of such interactions.

  1. Antipsychotics


  2. Haloperidol, quetiapine, ziprasidone, etc., can prolong QTc interval. Hence, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, etc., can have a synergistic effect and should be used with caution. Certain protease inhibitors like atazanavir, sequinavir, lopinavir/ritonavir can also cause QTc prolongation. The safer alternatives are lurasidone followed by aripiprazole, olanzapine, and risperidone.

  3. Antidepressants


  4. Citalopram, tricyclic antidepressants, and mirtazapine can prolong QTc interval, which might be augmented when combined with hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine. Escitalopram and sertraline are safer in view of lesser drug interactions and side effects.

  5. Mood Stabilisers


  6. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) increase lithium levels, which may lead to toxicity. Valproate levels may be reduced with lopinavir/ritonavir.

  7. Sedatives/hypnotics


  8. Longer acting benzodiazepines like diazepam or clonazepam may be avoided. Lorazepam is preferred as it has the least interaction with antiviral drugs and shorter half-life.



  Conclusion Top


COVID-19 ARDS is an anticipated severe complication of COVID-19 that requires prompt recognition and comprehensive multispeciality management [Flowchart 1]. Extensive research and studies are required to address the vital unanswered queries about treatment for COVID-19 ARDS. Because of the high mortality in mechanically ventilated patients of CARDS, the above recommendations and findings direct the potential for improvement in the management of patients with COVID-19 ARDS.



Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate permissions for publication.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



APPENDIX 1 : Status of COVID-19 Vaccines within WHO EUL/PQ evaluation process











 
  References Top

1.
World Health Organization. GCM teleconference – Note for the Records. 10 January 2020. Subject: Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Available from: https://www.who.int/blueprint/10-01-2020-nfr-gcm.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 09].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Xie P, Ma W, Tang H, Liu D. Severe COVID-19: A review of recent progress with a look toward the future. Front Public Health 2020;8:189. World Health Organization. Teleconference of the R and D Blueprint GCM. 20 January 2020. Pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan China. Available from: https://www.who.int/blueprint/priority-diseases/key-action/20-01-2020-nfr-gcm.pdf?ua=1.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
World Health Organization. Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Situation Report – 1. 21 January 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200121-sitrep-1-2019-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=20a99c10_4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
"WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard." World Health Organization, World Health Organization.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Cascella M, Rajnik M, Cuomo A, Dulebohn SC, Napoli RD. Features, Evaluation and Treatment Coronavirus (COVID-19). StatPearls Publishing; 2020.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Singhal T. A review of coronavirus disease 2019. Indian J Pediatr April 2020;87:281-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Ferguson, Niall D, et al. "The Berlin definition of ARDS: an expanded rationale, justification, and supplementary material." Intensive care medicine 2012;38:1573-82.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Singh, Vijay, et al. "Invasive Mechanical Ventilation of COVID-19 ARDS Patients." Revista Peruana de Investigación en Salud (2021);5:113-26.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Gibson PG, Qin L, Puah SH. COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): Clinical features and differences from typical pre-COVID-19 ARDS. Med J Aust 2020. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50674.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Huang L, Zhang C, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:420-2.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Wang J, Hajizadeh N, Moore EE, McIntyre RC, Moore PK, Veress LA, et al. Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) treatment for COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): A case series. J Thromb Haemost 2020;18:1752-5.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Ye Z, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Huang Z, Song B. Chest CT manifestations of new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A pictorial review. Eur Radiol 2020;30:4381-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Carsana L, Sonzogni A, Nasr A, Rossi RS, Pellegrinelli A, Zerbi P, et al. Pulmonary post-mortem findings in a series of COVID-19 cases from northern Italy: A two-centre descriptive study. Lancet 2020;20:P1135-40.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Bai T, Tu, Wei Y, Xiao L, Jin Y, Zhang L, et al. Clinical and laboratory factors predicting the prognosis of patients with COVID-19: An analysis of 127 patients in Wuhan, China. SSRN Electronic J. doi: 10.2139/ssrn. 3546118.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Yang AP, Liu JP, Tao WQ, Li HM. The diagnostic and predictive role of NLR, d-NLR and PLR in COVID-19 patients. Int Immunopharmacol 2020;84:106504. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp. 2020.106504.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA 2016;315:788–800.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med 2020;180:934-43.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Bikdeli, Behnood, et al. "COVID-19 and thrombotic or thromboembolic disease: implications for prevention, antithrombotic therapy, and follow-up: JACC state-of-the-art review." Journal of the American college of cardiology 75.23 (2020): 2950-2973.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Rubin GD, Ryerson CJ, Haramati LB, Sverzellati N, Kanne JP, Raoof S, et al. The role of chest imaging in patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multinational consensus statement from the Fleischner society. Chest 2020;158:106–16.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Sun Z, Zhang N, Li Y, Xu X. A systematic review of chest imaging findings in COVID-19. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2020;10:1058-79.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Litmanovich DE, Chung M, Kirkbride RR, Kicska G, Kanne JP. Review of chest radiograph findings of COVID-19 pneumonia and suggested reporting language. J Thorac Imaging 2020. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000541.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Spiro JE, Sisovic S, Ockert B, Böcker W, Siebenbürger G. Secondary tension pneumothorax in a COVID-19 pneumonia patient: A case report. Infection 2020;48:941–4.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Pan F, Ye T, Sun P, Gui S, Liang B, Li L, et al. Time course of lung changes at chest CT during recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Radiology 2020;295:715-21.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Xie P, Ma W, Tang H, Liu D. Severe COVID-19: A review of recent progress with a look toward the future. Front Public Health 2020;8:189.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Geleris J, Sun Y, Platt J, Zucker J, Baldwin M, Hripcsak G, et al. Observational study of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020;382:2411-8.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Singh V, Sasidharan S, Nasser A, Dhillon H. Intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation of COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. MRIMS J Heal Sci 2021;9:21-33.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
FDA. Coronavirus (COVID-19) update: FDA issues emergency use authorization for potential COVID-19 treatment. May 1, 2020. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Ison, Michael G., Cameron Wolfe, and Helen W. Boucher. "Emergency use authorization of remdesivir: the need for a transparent distribution process." Jama 323.23 (2020): 2365-2366.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Dagens A, Sigfrid L, Cai E, Lipworth S, Cheng V, Harris E, et al. Scope, quality, and inclusivity of clinical guidelines produced early in the covid-19 pandemic: Rapid review. BMJ 2020;369:m1936.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Zhao JP, Hu Y, Du RH, Chen ZS, Jin Y, Zhou M, et al. [Expert consensus on the use of corticosteroid in patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonia]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 2020;43:183-4.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Horby P, Landrain M. Low-cost dexamethasone reduces death by up to one third in hospitalised patients with severe respiratory complications of COVID-19. RECOVERY Trial Press Release. Available at: https://www. ox. ac. uk/news/2020-06-16-low-cost-dexamethasone-reduces-death-one-thirdhospitalised-patients-severe. Accessed July. 2020 Jun 16;5:2020.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Joyner MJ, Bruno KA, Klassen SA, Kunze KL, Johnson PW, Lesser ER, et al. Safety update: COVID-19 convalescent plasma in 20,000 hospitalized patients. Mayo Clin Proc 2020;95:1888-97.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Liu STH, Lin HM, Baine I, Wajnberg A, Gumprecht JP, Rahman F, et al. Convalescent plasma treatment of severe COVID-19: A matched control study. medRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.20.20102236.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Atal S, Fatima Z. IL-6 inhibitors in the treatment of serious COVID-19: a promising therapy?. Pharmaceutical Medicine. 2020 Aug;34(4):223-31.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Mallinckrodt Supports Investigator-Initiated Study at Massachusetts General Hospital to Assess Effectiveness of Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Due to COVID-19. Mallinckrodt plc. 2020 Apr 30. Available from: http://www.mallinckrodt.com/about.news-and-media/news-detail/?id=26721.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Tsang, Tim K., et al. "Effect of changing case definitions for COVID-19 on the epidemic curve and transmission parameters in mainland China: a modelling study." The Lancet Public Health 5.5 (2020): e289-e296.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Bellerophon Therapeutics announces FDA clears initiation of phase 3 study for iNOpulse inhaled nitric oxide therapy to treat COVID-19. Bellerophon Therapeutics.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
COVID-19 vaccines. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/covid-19-vaccines. [Last accessed on 2021 Apr 13].  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Li J, Fink JB, Ehrmann S. High-flow nasal cannula for COVID-19 patients: Low risk of bio-aerosol dispersion. Eur Respir J 2020;55:2000892.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Whittle JS, Pavlov I, Sacchetti AD, Atwood C, Rosenberg MS. Respiratory support for adult patient with COVID-19. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2020;1:95–101.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Anesi GL, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Critical care and airway management issues; Uptodate 2020.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Möhlenkamp S, Thiele H. Ventilation of covid-19 patients in intensive care units. Herz 2020:1-3. doi: 10.1007/s00059-020-04923-1.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Roca O, Caralt B, Messika J, Samper M, Sztrymf B, Hernández G, et al. An index combining respiratory rate and oxygenation to predict outcome of nasal high-flow therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;199:1368-76.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Alhazzani, Waleed, et al. "The saudi critical care society clinical practice guidelines on the management of COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit." Saudi Critical Care Journal 4.2 (2020): 27.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Luo M, Cao S, Wei L, Tang R, Hong S, Liu R, et al. Precautions for intubating patients with COVID-19. Anesthesiology 2020;132:1616-8.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Sasidharan S, Singh V, Dhillon H, Babitha M. Patient isolation pods for the evacuation of COVID-19 infected patients-Is this the answer? J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2020;36:S152–5.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Caironi P, Busana M, Romitti F, Brazzi L, et al. COVID-19 pneumonia: Different respiratory treatment for different phenotypes? Intensive Care Med 2020;46:1099-1102.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Sasidharan S, Goyal R, Babitha M, Singh S, Dhillon H. COVID aerosol barrier intubation box – Boon or bane? J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2020;36:S150-2.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Walling PT, Savege TM. A comparison of oesophageal and central venous pressures in the measurement of transpulmonary pressure change. Br J Anaesth. 1976;48:475–9.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
World Health Organization. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when novel coronavirus (nCoV) infection is suspected: interim guidance, 25 January 2020. No. WHO/nCoV/Clinical/2020.2. World Health Organization, 2020.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Dondorp AM, Hayat M, Aryal D, Beane A, Schultz MJ. Respiratory support in COVID-19 patients, with a focus on resource-limited settings. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020;102:1191-7.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Hanidziar D, Bittner EA. Sedation of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients: Challenges and special considerations. Anesth Analg 2020. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004887.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, et al. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2159-68.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Alhazzani W, Møller MH, Arabi YM, Loeb M, Gong MN, Fan E, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: Guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Intensive Care Med 2020;46:854-88.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
MacLaren G, Fisher D, Brodie D. Preparing for the most critically ill patients with COVID-19: The potential role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. JAMA 2020;323:1245-6.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, Shu H, Xia J, Liu H, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:P475-81.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Klompas M. What is new in the prevention of nosocomial pneumonia in the ICU? Curr Opin Crit Care 2017;23:378-84.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Beach SR, Praschan NC, Hogan C, Dotson S, Merideth F, Kontos N, et al. Delirium in COVID-19: A case series and exploration of potential mechanisms for central nervous system involvement. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2020;65:47-53.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Helms J, Kremer S, Merdji H, Clere-Jehl R, Schenck M, Kummerlen C, et al. Neurologic features in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. N Engl J Med 2020;382:2268-70.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Desforges M, Le Coupanec A, Brison É, Meessen-Pinard M, Talbot PJ. Neuroinvasive and neurotropic human respiratory coronaviruses: Potential neurovirulent agents in humans. Adv Exp Med Biol 2014;807:75-96.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.
Wu Y, Xu X, Chen Z, Duan J, Hashimoto K, Yang L, et al. Nervous system involvement after infection with COVID-19 and other coronaviruses. Brain Behav Immun 2020;87:18-22.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.
Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet 2020;395:507-13.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.
Machado C, DeFina PA, Chinchilla M, Machado Y, Machado Y. Brainstem dysfunction in SARS-COV2 infection can be a potential cause of respiratory distress. Neurol India 2020;68:989-93.  Back to cited text no. 63
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
64.
Catanzaro M, Fagiani F, Racchi M, Corsini E, Govoni S, Lanni C. Immune response in COVID-19: Addressing a pharmacological challenge by targeting pathways triggered by SARS-CoV-2. Signal Transduct Targeted Ther 2020;5:84.  Back to cited text no. 64
    
65.
Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, Speroff T, Gordon SM, Harrell FE Jr, et al. Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. JAMA 2004;291:1753–62.  Back to cited text no. 65
    
66.
Maldonado JR. Delirium pathophysiology: An updated hypothesis of the etiology of acute brain failure. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2018;33:1428–57.  Back to cited text no. 66
    
67.
Mascolo A, Berrino PM, Gareri P, Castagna A, Capuano A, Manzo C, et al. Neuropsychiatric clinical manifestations in elderly patients treated with hydroxychloroquine: A review article. Inflammopharmacology 2018;26:1141–9.  Back to cited text no. 67
    
68.
LaHue SC, James TC, Newman JC, Esmaili AM, Ormseth CH, Ely EW. Collaborative delirium prevention in the age of COVID-19. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020;68:947–9.  Back to cited text no. 68
    
69.
Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Dittus R, et al. Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: Validation of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med 2001;29:1370–9.  Back to cited text no. 69
    
70.
Van Eijk MM, van Marum RJ, Klijn IA, de Wit N, Kesecioglu J, Slooter AJ. Comparison of delirium assessment tools in a mixed intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2009;37:1881–5.  Back to cited text no. 70
    
71.
Maldonado JR, Sher YI, Benitez-Lopez MA, Savant V, Garcia R, Ament A, et al. A study of the psychometric properties of the "Stanford proxy test for delirium" (S-PTD): A new screening tool for the detection of delirium. Psychosomatics 2020;61:116–26.  Back to cited text no. 71
    
72.
Zhang R, Wang X, Ni L, Di X, Ma B, Niu S, et al. COVID-19: Melatonin as a potential adjuvant treatment. Life Sci 2020;250:117583.  Back to cited text no. 72
    
73.
Dhillon H, Sasidharan S, Dhillon G, Singh V, Babitha M. COVID-19: Neuropsychiatric manifestations and psychopharmacology. Ann Indian Psychiatry 2020;4:226.  Back to cited text no. 73
  [Full text]  
74.
Kawada K, Ohta T, Tanaka K, Miyamura M, Tanaka S. Addition of suvorexant to ramelteon therapy for improved sleep quality with reduced delirium risk in acute stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2019;28:142–8.  Back to cited text no. 74
    
75.
Roden DM, Harrington RA, Poppas A, Russo AM. Considerations for drug interactions on QTc in exploratory COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) treatment. Circulation 2020;141:e906-7.  Back to cited text no. 75
    
76.
Gordon DE, Jang GM, Bouhaddou M, Xu J, Obernier K, White KM, et al. A SARS- CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing. Nature 2020;583:459–68.  Back to cited text no. 76
    
77.
Schetz J, Perez E, Liu R, Chen S, Lee I, Simpkins JW. A prototypical sigma-1 receptor antagonist protects against brain ischemia. Brain Res 2007;1181:1–9.  Back to cited text no. 77
    
78.
Sher Y, Miller Cramer AC, Ament A, Lolak S, Maldonado JR. Valproic acid for treatment of hyperactive or mixed delirium: Rationale and literature review. Psychosomatics 2015;56:615–25.  Back to cited text no. 78
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  History
   Clinical Feature...
  Definition of ARDS
  Phenotypes of CARDS
   Possible Pathoge...
   Determinants of ...
   Radiodiagnosis a...
   Echocardiographi...
   Medical Manageme...
   Treatments Evalu...
   Oxygenation and ...
   Neuropsychiatric...
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed212    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded34    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal