Users Online: 79 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 


RSACP wishes to inform that it shall be discontinuing the dispatch of print copy of JOACP to it's Life members. The print copy of JOACP will be posted only to those life members who send us a written confirmation for continuation of print copy.
Kindly email your affirmation for print copies to [email protected] preferably by 30th June 2019.

 

 
Table of Contents
LETTERS TO EDITOR
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 36  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 566-568

Difficult airway: Airtraq—A boon


Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India

Date of Submission19-Aug-2019
Date of Acceptance05-Sep-2019
Date of Web Publication18-Jan-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Teena Bansal
19/6 J Medical Campus, PGIMS, Rohtak - 124 001, Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_273_19

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Bansal T, Kaur K, Kumar P, Bhardwaj M. Difficult airway: Airtraq—A boon. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2020;36:566-8

How to cite this URL:
Bansal T, Kaur K, Kumar P, Bhardwaj M. Difficult airway: Airtraq—A boon. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 5];36:566-8. Available from: https://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2020/36/4/566/307195



Dear Editor,

Conventional laryngoscopy and intubation is a standard technique of airway management. However, it may be difficult in certain circumstances like in patients with restricted neck movements and decreased mouth opening.[1] These patients pose a great challenge to anesthesiologists requiring airway management. Anesthesiologists should be familiar to alternate techniques to manage difficult airway scenario.

A 55-year-old male was diagnosed with carcinoma of left buccal mucosa and was scheduled for resection and flap reconstruction. Upon examination, mouth opening was 2 cm and neck movements were restricted. Left nares were less patent as per the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeon. Blood pressure (BP) was 120/76 mm Hg and heart rate was 90/min. Respiratory and cardiovascular systems were unremarkable. Relevant laboratory investigations were normal. Chest X-ray and electrocardiogram were normal. Surgeons needed nasal intubation. Therefore, awake nasal intubation using fiberscope was planned. The procedure was explained to the patient on the evening prior to surgery and consent was taken for the same. He was premedicated with 0.25 mg alprazolam along with 150 mg ranitidine in the night and 2 h before surgery. Preoperatively, his nose was decongested with xylometazoline nasal drops.

Standard monitors were attached in the operating room. Using 18 G cannula intravenous (IV) line was secured and Ringer's lactate was started. Glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg and fentanyl 30 μg were given intravenously. Nebulization was done with xylocaine. Superior laryngeal nerve along with transtracheal block were given. Ten percent Xylocaine was sprayed. Jelly was instilled into the right nostril and nasopharyngeal airway (NPA) 7 mm was tried but even 6 mm airway could not be inserted. Fiberscope was inserted without NPA and trachea was visualized. But, even a passage of 6 mm internal diameter tube was not possible. The ENT surgeon's opinion was taken. An S-shaped nasal septum was detected and nasal intubation was not possible. Patient was rescheduled for surgery one week later by the surgeons. Now, oral endotracheal intubation was planned. The mouth opening was just 2 cm. A Macintosh laryngoscope could not be inserted. So, intubation using an Airtraq was planned. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 100 μg and propofol 120 mg. Adequacy of ventilation was checked and 75 mg succinyl chloride was given.

Laryngoscopy was done using an Airtraq laryngoscope. Vocal cords were swollen. However, trachea was intubated successfully using an endotracheal tube with an internal diameter of 7 mm. Anesthesia was maintained with 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen, sevoflurane, and vecuronium. Intraoperatively, surgeons performed tracheostomy. Surgery lasted for 12 hours. At the end of the surgery, the patient was put on a ventilator for that night. Intraoperative and postoperative course was uneventful.

Difficult airway poses a major challenge to anesthesiologists. A leading cause of complications in anesthesia practice is failure to intubate the trachea successfully and secure the airway.[2] A large number of alternate airway devices and techniques have been developed and successfully implemented in difficult airway management algorithms.

Difficult intubation was anticipated due to restricted neck movements and a mouth opening of 2 cm. Initially, we planned awake nasal intubation, but it could not be successful due to the S-shaped nasal septum. The option left with us was oral intubation either awake or under anesthesia. We were planning awake oral fibreoptic intubation. Though last time the patient consented for awake intubation, this time the patient was very anxious and he refused. Mouth opening of 2 cm was a concern as the insertion of a Macintosh laryngoscope insertion was quite difficult with it.

Video laryngoscopy is considered as an initial approach for difficult intubation as advised by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) difficult airway algorithm.[3] Airtraq requires 19 mm mouth opening and McGrath has an anterioposterior width of 15 mm.[4],[5] Both of these could be used in this patient. We had an Airtraq, and we used it to intubate the patient. Airtraq facilitates tracheal intubation in difficult airways as it enables a better quality view of the glottis without the need to align the oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal axes. Airtraq has been used successfully in a simulated difficult airway or clinically difficult airway and as a rescue device after failed attempt with conventional laryngoscopy. However, alternate arrangements like cricothyrotomy, tracheostomy, and transtracheal jet ventilation were kept as standby.

To conclude, airway management is the main responsibility of the anesthesiologists. Anesthesiologist should have a knowledge of anticipated difficult airway and all the arrangements should be made to manage it.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given his consent for his images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that his name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal his identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Gupta AK, Ommid M, Nengroo S, Naqash I, Mehta A. Predictors of difficult intubation: Study in Kashmiri population. BJMP 2010;3:307.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Posner KC, Lee LA, Cheney FW. Management of difficult airway: A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2005;103:33-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT, Nickinnovich DG, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists task force on management of the difficult airway. Anesthesiology 2013;118:251-70.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
El-Tahan MR. Videolaryngoscopes for placement of double lumen tubes: Is it time to say goodbye to direct view. Saudi J Anaesth 2016;10:218-27.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
5.
Graterol J, Quader K. McGrath videolaryngoscope for an anticipated difficult airway. British J Anaesth 2009;103:308-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed168    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded30    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal