|
| |
 |
| ERRATUM |
|
| Year : 2019 | Volume
: 35
| Issue : 4 | Page : 539 |
|
Erratum: Ambu AuraGain versus intubating laryngeal tube suction as a conduit for endotracheal intubation
| Date of Web Publication | 13-Dec-2019 |
Correspondence Address:
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.189878
How to cite this article:
. Erratum: Ambu AuraGain versus intubating laryngeal tube suction as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2019;35:539 |
How to cite this URL:
. Erratum: Ambu AuraGain versus intubating laryngeal tube suction as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2021 Feb 26];35:539. Available from: https://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2019/35/4/539/189878 |
In the article titled “Ambu AuraGain versus intubating laryngeal tube suction as a conduit for endotracheal intubation”, published on pages 348-352, Issue 3, Volume 35 of Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology,[1] the name of the second author is written incorrectly as “Dalal G Priti” instead of “Priti G Dalal”.
The “How to cite this article” section should read correctly as “Bruceta MA, Dalal PG, McAllister P, Prozesky J, Vaida SJ, Budde AO. Ambu AuraGain versus intubating laryngeal tube suction as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2019;35:348-52”
| References | |  |
| 1. | Bruceta MA, Priti DG, McAllister P, Prozesky J, Vaida SJ, Budde AO. Ambu AuraGain versus intubating laryngeal tube suction as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2019;35:348-52.  [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
|
