|
| |
 |
| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2019 | Volume
: 35
| Issue : 4 | Page : 468-474 |
|
Pressure-controlled ventilation could decrease intraoperative blood loss and improve airway pressure measures during lumbar discectomy in the prone position: A comparison with volume-controlled ventilation mode
Amir Abouzkry El-Sayed, Sherif Kamal Arafa, Ayman Mohamady El-Demerdash
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt
| Date of Web Publication | 13-Dec-2019 |
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Amir Abouzkry El-Sayed
Beside Sadat Secondary School, Shanawan, Shebin El-Kom, Menofeya
Egypt
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_288_18
Background and Aims: Prone positioning may induce alterations of hemodynamic and airway pressure parameters that may affect intraoperative (IO) blood loss. Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) may modify these alterations. To observe the relation between ventilation mode and hemodynamic, airway pressure changes, and blood loss during lumbar discectomy performed in the prone position.
Material and Methods: Volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) patients were using tidal volume (TV) of 8–10 ml/Kg, but for pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) patients peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was adjusted to provide the same TV according to ideal body weight. Respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were recorded in supine (T1), on turning to prone (T2), and on returning to the supine position (T3). Primary outcome included amount of IO blood loss; Secondary outcome included need for blood transfusion, IO hemodynamics, and airway pressure changes.
Results: IO blood loss and central venous pressure (CVP) were significantly higher with VCV than PCV patients. Heart rate and blood pressure were significantly reduced in the prone position with little impact of ventilation mode. Prone positioning resulted in significant increase of P-peak and non-significant decrease of P-mean pressure with VCV, while with PCV resulted in a significantly increased airway pressures. P-peak pressure was significantly lower with PCV in supine and prone positions than VCV. P-mean pressure was significantly lower in supine but significantly higher in the prone position with PCV than VCV.
Conclusions: Prone positioning and VCV were associated with increased CVP and IO blood loss, while PCV could lessen these effects and significantly improve airway pressures.
Keywords: Airway pressure measures, intraoperative blood loss, lumbar position, ventilation mode
How to cite this article:
El-Sayed AA, Arafa SK, El-Demerdash AM. Pressure-controlled ventilation could decrease intraoperative blood loss and improve airway pressure measures during lumbar discectomy in the prone position: A comparison with volume-controlled ventilation mode. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2019;35:468-74 |
How to cite this URL:
El-Sayed AA, Arafa SK, El-Demerdash AM. Pressure-controlled ventilation could decrease intraoperative blood loss and improve airway pressure measures during lumbar discectomy in the prone position: A comparison with volume-controlled ventilation mode. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2021 Feb 26];35:468-74. Available from: https://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2019/35/4/468/272946 |
| Introduction | |  |
Lumbar disc herniation may lead to radiculopathy causing back pain.[1],[2] There is very little evidence of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) efficacy over volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) in the adult population.[3]
Prone positioning may induce alterations of hemodynamic[4] and airway pressure parameters[5] that may affect intraoperative (IO) blood loss. Thus, the current study hypothesized that PCV may modify these alterations.
Our study aimed to observe the relation between ventilation mode and hemodynamic, airway pressure changes, and blood loss during lumbar discectomy performed in the prone position.
Our primary outcome was the amount of IO blood loss. Secondary outcome included frequency of patients required a blood transfusion, number of transfused units, operative time, IO changes of HR, blood pressure, CVP, and airway pressures including P-peak and P-mean.
| Material and Methods | | |
After obtained approval of our institutional ethical committee (110/3/13), the current prospective, comparative study was conducted since June 2016 till March 2018. Patients classified by American Society of anesthesiologists as ASA grade I or II, aged 20–70 years were enrolled in this study for further evaluation for inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study included 119 eligible patients; 27 were excluded and 92 assigned for one-level lumbar discectomy underwent the intervention [Figure 1]. Exclusion criteria included obese patients with body mass index >30 kg/m2, patients with a history of expected difficult intubation, multiple level lumbar disc prolapse, previous chest surgery, restrictive pulmonary diseases, bleeding diathesis, asthmatic bronchitis, cardiac, hepatic or renal compromise, allergy to anesthetics or drugs planned to be used. Patients younger than 20 years, older than 70 years, or those attended as emergency cases were also excluded from the study.
Preoperative assessment included determination of demographic data, clinical evaluation, and determination of ASA grade. Then, all patients underwent radiologic workup and laboratory investigations including kidney and liver function tests, complete blood count [to record preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) concentration and hematocrit (HCT) value], and coagulation profile for assurance of inclusion and exclusion criteria. In addition, patients were examined immediately before anesthesia for baseline (T0) hemodynamic data including heart rate, blood pressure (BP) measures; systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP), and calculation of mean arterial pressure (MAP). Ideal body weight (IBW) was calculated according to the following equation: IBW= [(height in inches-60)–2.2] +50 for men or 45 for women.[6] Patients fulfilling inclusion criteria were asked to sign a written fully informed consent concerning the study plan detailed all needed interventions and were randomly, using sealed envelopes prepared by blinded assistant and chosen by the patient him/herself, divided into two groups according to controlled ventilation mode as follows:
- VCV group (46 Patients): after intubation, mechanical ventilation was initiated with 100% oxygen using volume-controlled mode (VCM) for a tidal volume (TV) of 8–10 ml/kg and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at 5 cmH2O with the respiratory rate (RR) was set to maintain an end-tidal CO2(ETCO2) of 30–35 mmHg, with inspiration/expiration (I/E) ratio = 1:2, without adjusting peak inspiratory pressure (PIP)
- PCV group (46 patients): Same ventilation settings except that PIP was adjusted for a flow rate to provide volume calculated according to IBW to achieve TV of 8–10 ml/kg with PEEP at 5 cmH2O.
The attending anesthesiologist used the standard anesthesia regimen in the study protocol, but he was blinded to the study protocol details. One of the authors was responsible for measuring and recording the data and changes and was blinded to the study protocol details and he did not share in patient care. All surgeries were performed by the same team of surgeons, and both surgeons and nurses who were providing patient care were blinded to the study protocol details.
Patients of both groups received the same anesthetic protocol including premedication using intravenous (IV) midazolam 2 mg, then the central venous catheter was inserted through the right internal jugular vein after local anesthetic infiltration for central venous pressure (CVP) measurement and fluid administration. Proper central venous catheter insertion was ascertained on C-arm fluoroscopy. In addition, the arterial cannula was inserted in the left radial artery after local anesthetic infiltration for invasive BP monitoring. Induction of anesthesia by fentanyl 2 μg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg followed by atracurium 0.5 mg/kg to facilitate tracheal intubation. Patients were maintained on controlled mask ventilation with 100% O2 until adequately relaxed within 3–5 min and then endotracheal armored tube was inserted. Incremental doses of fentanyl (0.5–1.0 ug/kg) and atracurium (0.1 mg/kg) were given according to needs, in addition to isoflurane 2% as an inhalational anesthetic agent in a mixture with O2 and air by 1:1 ratio. Standard monitoring for all patients included invasive monitoring for blood pressures, CVP, and urine output and non-invasive monitoring of HR using 5-lead ECG, SpO2, and ETCO2.
After stabilization of ventilation, respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were recorded in supine position (T1 measures). Then, patients were turned to a prone position and another reading for evaluated parameters was obtained (T2 measures), then, the surgical procedure was started. Total fixed amount of normal saline solution (200 ml) was used for intermittent wash of the surgical field for all patients in both groups to remove blood clots, clarify surgical field, and secure hemostasis; the resultant wash fluid was removed by suction in the suction canister and in the wet gauze intraoperatively and in the surgical drain postoperatively, and its amount was subtracted from the total IO and postoperative (PO) blood loss to get the actual amount of IO plus 24 h PO blood loss. At the end of surgery and reversing patients to supine position, the same parameters, together with IO haemoglobin (Hb) concentration and haematocrit (HCT) value were recorded (T3 measures). Then, all anesthetics were stopped, trachea was extubated when patients were recovered, and patients were transferred to post-anesthetic care unit and hemodynamic measures were re-determined (T4 measures). IO blood loss was calculated as the sum of the amount of blood collected in the suction canister and in the calculated net weight of gauze swabs. Total blood loss was calculated as the sum of IO and PO blood loss for 24 h PO. Blood transfusion regimen followed the hospital protocol to transfuse whole blood or packed red blood cells when the HCT value dropped below 30%; Hence, HCT value below 30% was the trigger used for IO and PO blood transfusion. In patients with HCT values more than 30%, blood loss was replaced by the administration of intravenous fluids with urine output monitoring to establish and preserve stable hemodynamic status. Postoperatively, Hb and HCT values were rechecked and recorded after 24 h.
Our primary outcome was the amount of IO blood loss. Secondary outcome included frequency of patients required a blood transfusion, number of transfused units, operative time, IO changes of HR, blood pressure, CVP, and airway pressures including P-peak and P-mean.
Statistical analysis
As regard statistical analysis, the sample size was calculated according to Rosner[7] based on a power of 80%, an alpha of 0.05, and the assumption that 30% of patients in VCV group would have increased IO blood loss that may require blood transfusion; a sample size of ≥40 patients per group was needed to detect a 20% decrease in rate of patients who may require blood transfusion in PCV group. Results were analyzed using paired and Student t test and Chi-square test (X2 test). Possible relationships were investigated using Pearson's linear regression. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS (Version 23, 2015) statistical package. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results | | |
The study included 119 eligible patients; 27 patients were excluded for not fulfilling inclusion criteria, whereas the remaining 92 patients assigned for one-level lumbar discectomy were undergoing the intervention [Figure 1]. Preoperative data of the enrolled patients showed the non-significant difference (P > 0.05), [Table 1].
Duration of maintenance in the prone position and total anesthesia time were non-significantly (P > 0.05) shorter in patients maintained on PCV than those maintained on VCV. The amount of IO blood loss was significantly (P < 0.05) higher, whereas PO blood loss was non-significantly (P > 0.05) higher with significantly (P < 0.05) higher amount of total blood loss in patients maintained on VCV than those maintained on PCV. Seventeen patients required blood transfusion with a non-significant difference (P > 0.05) between patients of both groups as regard a number of patients required blood transfusion or the number of transfused units. PO Hb and HCT values in VCV group were significantly (P < 0.05) lower than those in PCV group and both (Hb and HCT) were significantly lower than preoperative values in both groups [Table 2].
Pearson's correlation analysis showed a positive significant correlation between CVP measures on one side and prone positioning (r = 0.456, P = 0.001) and the maintenance on VCV ventilation mode (r = 0.378, P = 0.004) on the other side. Moreover, there was a positive significant correlation between high CVP and excess IO bleeding in both VCV (r = 0.505, P = 0.002) and PCV groups (r = 0.414, P = 0.015).
Turning patients who were maintained on VCV from supine to prone position resulted in significant (P < 0.05) increase of P-peak, but non-significant (P > 0.05) decrease of P-mean pressure measures. However, turning patients who were maintained on PCV from supine to prone position resulted in significant (P < 0.05) increase of all estimated airway pressures. P-peak pressure was significantly (P < 0.05) lower in patients maintained on PCV in both supine and prone position than the patients who were maintained on VCV. However, P-mean pressure was significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the supine position but was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the prone position in patients maintained on PCV than the patients maintained on VCV [Table 3]. | Table 3: Respiratory parameters of mechanical ventilation of patients of both groups estimated during supine and prone positions
Click here to view |
Changing patients to prone position (T2) significantly (P < 0.05) reduced HR and BP measures compared to measures at supine positions before turning to prone position (T1) and after return to supine position at the end of surgery (T3). In spite increased HR and BP measures at T3, these measures were still significantly (P < 0.05) lower than T1 measures. However, mode of ventilation showed little impact on HR and BP measures, manifested as non-significant (P > 0.05) difference between measures recorded in patients of both groups throughout anesthesia time. Moreover, patients maintained on VCV showed significantly (P < 0.05) higher CVP at T1, T2, and T3 than the patients maintained on PCV [Table 4]. | Table 4: Hemodynamic findings of patients of studied groups throughout operative time
Click here to view |
| Discussion | | |
In our study, patients maintained on VCV showed significantly higher IO blood loss on one side and significantly higher CVP at T1-3 compared to patients maintained on PCV on the other side with a positive significant correlation between IO blood loss and CVP. Moreover, prone positioning showed positive significant correlation with increased CVP and IO blood loss. These findings spotlight on a fact that prone positioning and/or VCV induced increased venous engorgement resulting in increased CVP and bleeding of injured vessels during surgery. Similarly, Koh et al.[8] found IO blood loss was correlated with peak airway pressure changes and Malhotra et al.[9] detected increased mean airway pressure and IO blood loss on prone position during spine surgery. In addition, Kang et al.[10] reported that PCV decreased IO surgical bleeding in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery and this may be related to lower IO peak inspiratory pressure.
In trial to explain the relation between prone positioning, ventilation mode, increased CVP, and IO blood loss, Malhotra et al.[9] detected that prolonged prone positioning during surgery induces increased intra-abdominal pressure and associated increased IO blood loss. In addition, Ma et al.,[11] Berger et al.[12] and Min et al.[13] found short-term prone positioning may have a direct effect on cardiac function with decreased stroke volume and cardiac output. Moreover, Koprulu et al.[14] suggested that high frequency-low TV ventilation during general anesthesia for lumbar microdiscectomy can be useful in minimizing epidural venous engorgement and bleeding by using low peak pressure during surgery.
However, ventilation mode showed a significant impact on airway pressure as manifested by significantly lower P-peak pressure in patients maintained on PCV than the patients maintained on VCV in both supine and prone positions. Moreover, the significant difference in P-mean pressure, between both ventilation modes, on turning patients from supine to prone position illustrated the beneficial effect of PCV.
In line with these findings, Sen et al.[5] reported that P-peak levels during supine and prone positions were significantly higher, and P-mean and compliance levels during prone position were significantly lower with VCV than PCV. In addition, Jo et al.[15] found PCV provided significantly lower P-peak than VCV when the ventilator is set to deliver the same TV in patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine surgery in both supine and prone positions with a significant difference between supine and prone measurements in both groups. In addition, Liao et al.[16] documented that PCV offered lower peak airway pressure and higher compliance than VCV during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Recently, in 2018, Tan et al.[17] reported that during radical resection of pulmonary carcinoma using one-lung ventilation, in comparison to VCV, PCV could reduce P peak. Moreover, Kothari and Baskaran[18] found PCV mode resulted in lower peak airway pressures, better compliance, and lower arterial to end-tidal CO2 gradient than the VCV.
Thereafter, Hoşten et al.[19] found both PaO2/FiO2 and P-mean were higher, whereas P-peak was lower at open-heart surgery with PCV than VCV, and Messeha[20] also found the use of PCV after VCV induced improvement of lung mechanics in obese patients undergoing abdominoplasty. Moreover, Jaju et al.[21] found AP-mean and AP-peak were significantly higher with VCV than the PCV, whereas dynamic lung compliance and PaCO2 were better with PCV than VCV. In support of the beneficial effect of PCV, Ghabach et al.[22] reported significantly higher PIP, but significantly lower compliance with VCV than PCV and PC-volume guarantee modes with the non-significant difference between PCV and PC-volume guarantee. Recently, Kock and Maurici[23] documented low lung compliance during VCV and low oxygenation index were death-related prognostic indicators.
The results of the current study showed a deleterious effect of prone positioning on estimated hemodynamic parameters as manifested by significantly reduced HR and BP measures in prone position (T2) compared to measures at the supine positions (T1 and T3). Moreover, prone positioning affected airway pressures, with significantly higher P-peak, irrespective of ventilation mode. In line with these findings, Channabasappa and Shankarnarayana[24] reported that during emergence from anesthesia HR and MAP were significantly higher in patients in supine than in patients in the prone position and Koh et al.[8] detected a significant increase of P-mean and P-peak airway pressures after placement of the patient in the prone position. In addition, Al-Dessoukey et al.[25] detected decreased MAP by 2 and 14 mmHg on turning patients from supine to oblique supine lithotomy position and prone position, respectively. Babakhani et al.[4] observed significant reductions in HR and MAP accompanied by significant decreases in cerebral oxygen saturation at 30 and 60 min of prone positioning, and Picard et al.[26] documented that MAP decreased below the predefined threshold in about 50% of patients during elective spine surgery in the prone position.
However, ventilation mode showed a minimal impact on HR and MAP of studied patients, irrespective of patients' position. The reported negligible effect of ventilation mode on HR and MAP goes in hand with multiple studies evaluating the same topic, where Hoşten et al.[19] reported that the hemodynamic effects of PC and VC ventilation modes were found to be similar, but PCV may be preferable to VCV in patients undergoing open-heart surgery, and Messeha[20] evaluated the effect of PCV before or after VCV on hemodynamic variables and reported no significant difference between studied patients groups. In addition, Jaju et al.[21] found hemodynamic variables were comparable between patients maintained on PCV and VCV.
Although insertion of central venous catheter and arterial cannula before induction is not a routine in our center, we decided to secure it before induction in our study. It was done before by Stuedemann et al.[27] who found that central vascular access for a pediatric spine patient placed the day before surgery can decrease the time from induction to skin incision, to decrease the time under general anesthesia and potentially improve patient safety, and overall value.
The study limitations included the small sample size that could be attributed to a limited number of beds for spine surgery and the hospital is not a referral to receive patients who were referred from other hospitals. The study design as a single-center study done on patients having one specific type of surgery could be another limitation to establish the obtained results.
Finally, we concluded that prone positioning and VCV were associated with increased CVP and IO blood loss, whereas PCV could lessen these effects and significantly improve airway pressures. Wider scale study is mandatory to evaluate the outcome on larger scale populations and other inclusion criteria.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Corniola MV, Tessitore E, Schaller K, Gautschi OP. Lumbar disc herniation--Diagnosis and treatment. Rev Med Suisse 2014;10:2376-82.  |
| 2. | Ran J, Hu Y, Zheng Z, Zhu T, Zheng H, Jing Y, et al. Comparison of discectomy versus sequestrectomy in lumbardischerniation: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. PLoS One 2015;10(3):e0121816. |
| 3. | Ashworth L, Norisue Y, Koster M, Marrt JA, Takada J, Ebisu H. Clinical management of pressure control ventilation: An algorithmic method of patient ventilatory management to address “forgotten but important variables”. J Crit Care 2018;43:169-82. |
| 4. | Babakhani B, Heroabadi A, Hosseinitabatabaei N, Schott M, Yekaninejad S, Jantzen JP, et al. Cerebral oxygenation under general anaesthesia can be safely preserved in patients in prone position: A prospective observational study. J Neurosurg Anaesthesiol 2017;29:291-7. |
| 5. | Sen O, Bakan M, Umutoglu T, Aydın N, Toptas M, Akkoc I. Effects of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics and systemic stress response during prone position. Springerplus 2016;5:1761. |
| 6. | Pai MP, Paloucek FP. The origin of the “ideal” body weight equations. Ann Pharmacother 2000;34:1066-9. |
| 7. | Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 7 th ed., vol. 8. Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole; 2011. p. 269-326. |
| 8. | Koh JC, Lee JS, Han DW, Choi S, Chang CH. Increase in airway pressure resulting from prone position patient placing may predict intraoperative surgical blood loss. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E678-82. |
| 9. | Malhotra A, Gupta V, Abraham M, Punetha P, Bundela Y. Quantifying the amount of bleeding and associated changes in intra-abdominal pressure and mean airway pressure in patients undergoing lumbar fixation surgeries: A comparison of three positioning systems. Asian Spine J 2016;10:199-204. |
| 10. | Kang WS, Oh CS, Kwon WK, Rhee KY, Lee YG, Kim TH, et al. Effect of mechanical ventilation mode type on intra- and postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Anaesthesiology 2016;125:115-23. |
| 11. | Ma M, Noori S, Maarek JM, Holschneider DP, Rubinstein EH, Seri I. Prone positioning decreases cardiac output and increases systemic vascular resistance in neonates. J Perinatol 2015;35:424-7. |
| 12. | Berger K, Francony G, Bouzat P, Halle C, Genty C, Oddoux M, et al. Prone position affects stroke volume variation performance in predicting fluidresponsiveness in neurosurgical patients. Minerva Anaestesiol 2015;81:628-35. |
| 13. | Min JJ, Lee JH, Hong KY, Choi SJ. Utility of stroke volume variation measured using non-invasive bioreactance as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in the prone position. J Clin Monit Comput 2017;31:397-405. |
| 14. | Koprulu AS, Canatan C, Haspolat A, Kahraman S. Ventilation mode and epidural bleeding in microdiscectomy: Comparison of two ventilation techniques. Turk Neurosurg 2016;26:777-82. |
| 15. | Jo YY, Kim JY, Kwak YL, Kim YB, Kwak HJ. The effect of pressure-controlled ventilation on pulmonary mechanics in the prone position during posterior lumbar spine surgery: A comparison with volume-controlled ventilation. J Neurosurg Anaesthesiol 2012;24:14-8. |
| 16. | Liao CC, Kau YC, Ting PC, Tsai SC, Wang CJ. The effects of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation on lung mechanics, oxidative stress, and recovery in gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynaecol 2016;23:410-7. |
| 17. | Tan J, Song Z, Bian Q, Li P, Gu L. Effects of volume-controlled ventilation vs. pressure-controlled ventilation on respiratory function and inflammatory factors in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic radical resection of pulmonary carcinoma. J Thorac Dis 2018;10:1483-9. |
| 18. | Kothari A, Baskaran D. Pressure-controlled volume guaranteed mode improves respiratory dynamics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A comparison with conventional modes. Anaesth Essays Res 2018;12:206-12. |
| 19. | Hoşten T, Kuş A, Gümüş E, Yavuz Ş, İrkil S, Solak M. Comparison of intraoperative volume and pressure-controlled ventilationmodes in patients who undergo open heart surgery. J Clin Monit Comput 2017;31:75-84. |
| 20. | Messeha MM. Effect of switching between pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics and haemodynamics in obese patients during abdominoplasty. Anaesth Essays Res 2017;11:88-93. |
| 21. | Jaju R, Jaju PB, Dubey M, Mohammad S, Bhargava AK. Comparison of volume controlled ventilation and pressure controlled ventilation in patients undergoing robot-assisted pelvic surgeries: An open-label trial. Indian J Anaesth 2017;61:17-23. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 22. | Ghabach MB, El Hajj EM, El Dib RD, Rkaiby JM, Matta MS, Helou MR. Ventilation of non-paralyzed patients under anaesthesia with laryngeal mask airway, comparison of three modes of ventilation: Volume controlled ventilation, pressure controlled ventilation, and pressure controlled ventilation-volume guarantee. Anaesth Essays Res 2017;11:197-200. |
| 23. | Kock KS, Maurici R. Respiratory mechanics, ventilator-associated pneumonia and outcomes in intensive care unit. World J Crit Care Med 2018;7:24-30. |
| 24. | Channabasappa SM, Shankarnarayana P. A comparative study of haemodynamic changes between prone and supine emergence from anaesthesia in lumbar disc surgery. Anesth Essays Res 2013;7:173-7. [Full text] |
| 25. | Al-Dessoukey AA, Moussa AS, Abdelbary AM, Zayed A, Abdallah R, Elderwy AA, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the oblique supine lithotomy position and prone position: A comparative study. J Endourol 2014;28:1058-63. |
| 26. | Picard J, Bedague D, Bouzat P, Ollinet C, Albaladejo P, Bosson JL, et al. Oesophageal Doppler to optimize intraoperative haemodynamics during prone position. A randomized controlled trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2016;35:255-60. |
| 27. | Stuedemann AE, Schwend RM, Thomas VK, Leamon JM, Lightner TS.A peripherally inserted central catheter line, inserted the day before surgery, decreases the time from induction to incision for spinal deformity surgery and safely provides central venous access during surgery: A pilot study.J Pediatr Orthop B 2018;27:176-9. |
[Figure 1]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
|
Search Pubmed for
