Users Online: 298 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 
 

 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 33  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 102-106

A comparative study of the effect of clonidine, fentanyl, and the combination of both as adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in total abdominal hysterectomy


Department of Anaesthesiology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Date of Web Publication15-Mar-2017

Correspondence Address:
Mamta Khandelwal
Flat No. 201, B-80, Sona Enclave, Rajendra Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.202194

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background and Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of sensory block, onset and duration of motor block, postoperative analgesia, and adverse effects of combination of clonidine and fentanyl given intrathecally with hyperbaric bupivacaine (HB).
Material and Methods: Three hundred and twenty eight patients were randomized into four groups. Group bupivacaine (group B) received 15 mg of HB; group bupivacaine clonidine (group BC) received 15 mg of HB plus 25 μg clonidine; group bupivacaine fentanyl (group BF) received 15 mg of HB plus 25 μg fentanyl and group bupivacaine clonidine fentanyl (group BCF) received 15 mg of HB plus 25 μg clonidine and 25 μg fentanyl intrathecally. All groups were evaluated for level of sensory block, onset and duration of motor block, postoperative analgesia, VAS score, sedation score and adverse effects of study drugs. All the data were analyzed using unpaired t-test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: The level of sensory block, onset, and duration of motor block were comparable in all groups. Total duration of analgesia was 407.3 ± 20 min in group BCF compared to 242.1 ± 2 min and 209.2 ± 16 in groups BC and BF, respectively. Lesser doses of rescue analgesic were required in group BCF. The time interval from intrathecal injection to two-segment regression was statistically significant in study groups. Only 2.4% patients showed mild sedation in BCF group.
Conclusion: We found that combination of intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl along with bupivacaine increases the total duration of analgesia without significant side effects.

Keywords: Abdominal hysterectomy, clonidine, fentanyl, intrathecal


How to cite this article:
Ahmed F, Khandelwal M, Sharma A. A comparative study of the effect of clonidine, fentanyl, and the combination of both as adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in total abdominal hysterectomy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2017;33:102-6

How to cite this URL:
Ahmed F, Khandelwal M, Sharma A. A comparative study of the effect of clonidine, fentanyl, and the combination of both as adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in total abdominal hysterectomy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Mar 28];33:102-6. Available from: http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2017/33/1/102/202194


  Introduction Top


Management of postoperative pain increases patient satisfaction, leads to earlier mobilization, shortens hospital stay, and reduces hospital costs.[1],[2],[3] A major goal in the management of postoperative pain is to minimize the dose of medications in view to reduce incidence of side effects while still providing adequate analgesia. This goal is best-accomplished with a multimodal approach.[4]

Regional and neuraxial technique can provide superior analgesia compared to systemic drugs. Spinal anesthesia using only local anesthetics is associated with relatively short duration of action and thus early analgesic intervention is needed in the postoperative period. A number of adjuvants such as midazolam, clonidine, dexmedetomidine etc. have been used to prolong the duration of spinal anesthesia. Fentanyl is a potent, short-acting, highly lipophilic, synthetic opioid. It has been commonly used as an adjuvant for postoperative analgesia in neuraxial block.[5],[6]

Clonidine is a alpha-1 and alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist with a predominant alpha-2 action (a2:a1: 200:1).[7] Neuraxial placement of clonidine inhibits spinal substance P release and nociceptive neuron firing produced by noxious stimulation. Substance P release inhibits the cGMP for its analgesic effect.[8],[9]

The primary aim of this study was to compare the effect of intrathecal clonidine, fentanyl, and the combination of both with bupivacaine for duration of postoperative analgesia.


  Material and Methods Top


This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted at a tertiary care center after approval from the hospital Ethics Committee. Three hundred twenty eight female patients of 30-50 years, weighing between 45-65 kg, belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II and scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy were included in the present study. Patients with a contraindication to spinal anesthesia or major neurological, cardiovascular, metabolic, respiratory, renal disease, or coagulation abnormalities were excluded from the study.

The procedure was explained to the patient, and written informed consent was taken. In the holding room, the concept of a visual analog scale (VAS),[10] which consists of a 100 mm line with zero denoting no pain at all and 100 denoting the worst possible pain, was introduced to the patient. Randomization was done by chit in box method. Patients were divided into four groups each consisting of 82 patients. (n = 82).

Group bupivacaine (group B) received 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (HB) intrathecally, group bupivacaine clonidine (group BC) received 15 mg of hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine plus 25 µg clonidine hydrochloride intrathecally, group bupivacaine fentanyl (group BF) received 15 mg of 0.5% HB plus 25 µg fentanyl citrate intrathecally, and group bupivacaine clonidine fentanyl (group BCF) received 15 mg of 0.5% HB plus 25 µg clonidine hydrochloride and 25 µg fentanyl citrate intrathecally. In all four groups, normal saline was added to make the total volume 4 ml.

In the operating room, fasting status, consent, PAC were checked, and intravenous access was secured. After the establishment of intravenous (IV) line and attachment of standard monitors [non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), electrocardiography (ECG), and pulse oximetry (SpO2)], all patients were premedicated with midazolam 1 mg intravenously. Hydration consisted of 10 ml/kg Ringer lactate solution preoperatively and 10 ml/kg/hr after spinal anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia was performed in the operating room at the L3-L4 interspace, with the patient in the left lateral position. A volume of 4 ml of the study drug was injected over 30s through a 25-gauge spinal needle. The patient was placed in the supine position with a 15° head down tilt immediately after spinal injection to achieve a block level of T5-T6. The drug combination was prepared by one anesthetist and administered by another anesthetist who was unaware of the nature of drug solution. All the observations were done by the second anesthetist.

Intraoperatively the level of sensory block, onset of motor block, patient's hemodynamic parameters, and sedation score were recorded. The level of sensory block was assessed using a 22-gauge needle and recorded as a loss of sensation to pin prick, checking in a caudal to cephalic direction. Motor block was recorded according to the Bromage scale.[11] NIBP was recorded at 5 min interval throughout the surgery and HR and SPO2 were recorded continuously. Fluid administration was continued intraoperatively, and a decrease in mean arterial pressure >15% below the preanesthetic baseline value was treated with incremental doses of injection mephenteremine 5 mg intravenous (IV). A decrease in HR below 50 beats/min was treated with incremental doses of atropine 0.3 mg IV. Intraoperative nausea was treated with ondansetron 4 mg IV.

Postoperatively, time for two segment regression and total duration of motor block was recorded. VAS was assessed at 2 h interval and at the time of giving rescue analgesia. Adverse effects (hemodynamic changes, respiratory depression, shivering, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and headache) were observed over 24 h. The duration of effective analgesia was defined as the time from intrathecal drug administration to the patient's first request for rescue analgesic. This constituted the primary end point of the study, though the patients were kept under observation for a total period of 24 h. Patients were allowed to receive rescue analgesics on demand. Gluteal intramuscular diclofenac (75 mg) was given as rescue analgesic. The duration of motor block was defined as the time of attainment of Bromage grade IV block (onset) until reversal to Bromage grade II.

Statistical analysis

The expected mean VAS among A, B, and C group were 23 (±71), 17 (±6), and 2 (±1), respectively, and the expected mean duration of time for the request of first analgesic in (A), (B) and (C) were 137 (±35), 183 (±80), and 215 (±79) min, respectively (as per se ed article).[10] The sample size required to determine these differences in three groups at 95% confidence interval and 80% power would be 82 in each group. This sample size would cover both observations. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 15.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical data, that is, ASA grade, type of surgery and the incidence of adverse events (hypotension, bradycardia, respiratory depression, shivering, nausea, pruritis, and headache) are presented as numbers (percent) and were compared among groups using the Chi-square test. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


  Results Top


Three hundred forty patients were assessed for eligibility. Twelve patients did not fulfill the study criteria and were excluded. 328 patients were enrolled. All the groups were comparable with respect to age, gender, weight, ASA status, type of surgery, and duration of surgery [Table 1].
Table 1: Demographic profile of groups

Click here to view


The characteristics of sensory and motor blockade are given in [Table 2]. Visual analog scale scores at 2 h and at the time of giving rescue analgesia are shown in [Table 3]. The average VAS pain score at the time of giving rescue analgesic medication was similar among groups.
Table 2: Characteristics of sensory and motor block

Click here to view
Table 3: Pain score

Click here to view


In groups B and BC, all the patients were awake and alert (grade I). In group BF; 97.6% patients were awake and alert (grade I), 2.4% patients showed mild sedation (grade II). In group BCF, 97.6% patients were awake and alert (grade I), 2.4% patients showed mild sedation (grade II).

In all four groups, patients were hemodynamically stable in intraoperative and postoperative period. There were no significant differences among groups regarding the incidence of perioperative adverse effects [Table 4].
Table 4: Characteristics of hemodynamic and incidence of side effects (intraoperative and early postoperative period

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Neuraxial adjuvants have been used to improve or prolong analgesia, decrease the adverse effects associated with high doses of a single local anesthetic agent, to increase the speed of onset of neural blockade (reduce latency), improve the quality, and prolong the duration of neural blockade. Many drugs (fentanyl, morphine, vasoconstrictors such as epinephrine and phenylephrine, α2-agonists) have been used as an additive to local anesthetics.[12]

Benhamou et al.[12] in a study observed that adding a small dose of intrathecal clonidine (75 μg) and fentanyl (12.5 μg) to bupivacaine increased the quality of intraoperative analgesia and decreased pain during cesarean section. In our study, we have used 25 µg of clonidine instead of 75 µg intrathecally and observed significantly prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia with good hemodynamic stability.

Santos et al.[13] showed that both 20 μg of fentanyl and 10 μg of clonidine promoted satisfactory anesthesia and good postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing anal surgery. Even a very low intrathecal dose of 15 µg of clonidine was able to increase motor block duration. In our study, we did not find any effect on the duration of motor block even with 25 µg of clonidine. Garg et al.[14] have shown an increase in postoperative analgesia when fentanyl 25 µg is added to intrathecal bupivacaine in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy.

Biswas et al.[15] showed that the addition of 12.5 µg of fentanyl markedly improved intraoperative anesthesia, and significantly reduced the demand for postoperative analgesia with good satisfaction and well-being for patient. Khanna and Singh [16] reported an increase in duration of sensory block, improvement in intraoperative analgesia, and good pain relief in the postoperative period along with high incidence of pruritus and desaturation with fentanyl added to intrathecal bupivacaine in geriatric patients.

Dobrydnjov et al.[17] concluded that the addition of clonidine 15 μg and 30 mg to bupivacaine prolonged time to first analgesic request and decreased postoperative pain with minimal risk of hypotension. Khandelwal et al.[18] found that time to first analgesic request is prolonged by addition of clonidine in a dose of 50 μg. In their study, total duration of analgesia was 302 ± 54 which was more than that observed in our study because they used a higher dose of clonidine.

Though we use 25 microgm of clonidine and fentanyl each, further research is desirable to validate the various dosage combinations of clonidine and fentanyl.


  Conclusion Top


The combination of intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl with hyperbaric bupivacaine significantly prolonged the duration of postoperative analgesia with good hemodynamic stability and nonsignificant adverse effect.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
de Beer Jde V, Winemaker MJ, Donnelly GA, Miceli PC, Reiz JL, Harsanyi Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of controlled-release oxycodone and standard therapies for postoperative pain after knee or hip replacement. Can J Surg 2005;48:277-83.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Recart A, Duchene D, White PF, Thomas T, Johnson DB, Cadeddu JA. Efficacy and safety of fast-track recovery strategy for patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Endourol 2005;19:1165-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Watcha MF, Issioui T, Klein KW, White PF. Costs and effectiveness of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and acetaminophen for preventing pain after ambulatory otolaryngologic surgery. Anesth Analg 2003;96:987-94.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Gandhi K, Baratta JL, Heitz JW, Schwenk ES, Vaghari B, Viscusi ER. Acute pain management in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesthesiol Clin 2012;30:e1-15.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Gupta R, Verma R, Bogra J, Kohli M, Raman R, Kushwaha JK. A comparative study of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2011;27:339-43.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
6.
Cowan CM, Kendall JB, Barclay PM, Wilkes RG. Comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and diamorphine in addition to bupivacaine for caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2002;89:452-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Liu N, Bonnet F, Delaunay L, Kermarec N. Clonidine produces analgesia by actions on alpha2-adrenoceptors. Br J Anaesth 1993;70:515-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Eisenach JC, De Kock M, Klimscha W. Alpha(2)-adrenergic agonists for regional anesthesia. A clinical review of clonidine (1984-1995). Anesthesiology 1996;85:655-74.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Dobrydnjov I, Axelsson K, Samarütel J, Holmström B. Postoperative pain relief following intrathecal bupivacaine combined with intrathecal or oral clonidine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002;46:806-14.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of six methods. Pain 1986;27:117-26.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Bromage PR. A comparison of the hydrochloride and carbon dioxide salts of lidocaine and prilocaine in epidural analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1965;16:55-9.   Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Benhamou D, Thorin D, Brichant JF, Dailland P, Milon D, Schneider M. Intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl with hyperbaric bupivacaine improves analgesia during cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1998;87:609-13.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Santos EJ, Riberio SC, Trindade DC, Garcia AE, Portella AA. Fentanyl versus clonidine as adjuvants to isobaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for anus surgeries. Anesthesiology 2007;107:A883.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Garg A, Ahmed F, Khandelwal M, Verma AP. Transdermal nitroglycerine enhances postoperative analgesia of intrathaecal fentanyl following abdominal hysterectomies. Aust Soc Anesth 2010;38:285-90.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Biswas BN, Rudra A, Bose BK, Nath S, Chakrabarthy S, Bhattacharya S. Intrathecal fentanyl with bupivacaine for intraoperative * postoperative analgesia. Indian J Anaesth 2002;46:469-72.  Back to cited text no. 15
  [Full text]  
16.
Khanna MS, Singh IK. Comparative evaluation of bupivacaine plain versus bupivacaine with fentanyl in spinal anaesthesia in geriatric patients. Indian J Anaesth 2002;46:199-203.  Back to cited text no. 16
  [Full text]  
17.
Dobrydnjov I, Axelsson K, Thörn SE, Matthiesen P, Klockhoff H, Holmström B, et al. Clonidine combined with small-dose bupivacaine during spinal anesthesia for inguinal herniorrhaphy: A randomized double-blinded study. Anesth Analg 2003;96: 1496-503.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Khandelwal M, Ahmed F, Garg A, Verma A, Aquil, Chatterjee C. Transdermal nitroglycerine enhances the post-operative analgesic effect of intrathecal clonidine in abdominal hysterectomies. Indian J Anaesth 2012;56:79-81.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Material and Methods
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed118    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded21    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal